Literature DB >> 11803086

Mucosal [SIgA] and serum [IgG] immunologic responses in the community after a single intra-nasal immunization with a new inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine.

Evgenia Greenbaum1, Arthur Furst, Alexander Kiderman, Brendon Stewart, Reuven Levy, Miriam Schlesinger, Avraham Morag, Zichria Zakay-Rones.   

Abstract

Influenza morbidity affects entire populations, imposing an enormous burden in economic terms from working days lost. Protection afforded by current vaccines is often unsatisfactory and many individuals remain averse to injections. To counter these drawbacks, we tested an inactive intra-nasal trivalent influenza vaccine on 182 vaccinated and 92 placebo subjects in the community. On study completion 73 and 66% of the subjects were immune to the vaccine's two A strains, 40% (> or=1:40) and 65% (> or=1:20) to its B strain; 30-40% demonstrated a 4x hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) titer increase; GMT titers increased 2.2-2.5x. About 50% of those initially non-immune became immune. A local antibody response to the three vaccine strains was recorded in 31-44% of vaccinees in which 57, 68 and 54% exhibited a mucosal and/or serum antibody response to the A/Johannesburg, A/Nanchang and B/Harbin strains, respectively. A higher dose (40mg) of A/Johannesburg in the vaccine did not influence response. The new vaccine was safe, without side-effects, and offered reasonable protection after one dose. It could thus play an important role in increasing enrollment into immunization programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11803086     DOI: 10.1016/s0264-410x(01)00396-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  7 in total

1.  A dose-response evaluation of inactivated influenza vaccine given intranasally and intramuscularly to healthy young adults.

Authors:  Robert L Atmar; Wendy A Keitel; Thomas R Cate; Flor M Munoz; Fred Ruben; Robert B Couch
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Co-delivery of GPI-anchored CCL28 and influenza HA in chimeric virus-like particles induces cross-protective immunity against H3N2 viruses.

Authors:  Teena Mohan; Jongrok Kim; Zachary Berman; Shelly Wang; Richard W Compans; Bao-Zhong Wang
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 9.776

3.  Contrasting effects of type I interferon as a mucosal adjuvant for influenza vaccine in mice and humans.

Authors:  Robert B Couch; Robert L Atmar; Thomas R Cate; John M Quarles; Wendy A Keitel; Nancy H Arden; Janet Wells; Diane Niño; Philip R Wyde
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Evaluation of a vectored equine herpesvirus type 1 (EHV-1) vaccine expressing H3 haemagglutinin in the protection of dogs against canine influenza.

Authors:  Cristina Rosas; Gerlinde R Van de Walle; Stephan M Metzger; Karin Hoelzer; Edward J Dubovi; Sung G Kim; Colin R Parrish; Nikolaus Osterrieder
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2008-03-31       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Endocine™, N3OA and N3OASq; three mucosal adjuvants that enhance the immune response to nasal influenza vaccination.

Authors:  Tina Falkeborn; Andreas Bråve; Marie Larsson; Britt Akerlind; Ulf Schröder; Jorma Hinkula
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults.

Authors:  Vittorio Demicheli; Tom Jefferson; Eliana Ferroni; Alessandro Rivetti; Carlo Di Pietrantonj
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-02-01

7.  Intranasal vaccination with an inactivated whole influenza virus vaccine induces strong antibody responses in serum and nasal mucus of healthy adults.

Authors:  Akira Ainai; Shin-Ichi Tamura; Tadaki Suzuki; Elly van Riet; Ryo Ito; Takato Odagiri; Masato Tashiro; Takeshi Kurata; Hideki Hasegawa
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.452

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.