Literature DB >> 11802880

Female and male perceptions of female physical attractiveness in front-view and profile.

Martin J. Tovée1, Piers L. Cornelissen.   

Abstract

Two important cues to female physical attractiveness are body mass index (BMI) and shape. In front view, it seems that BMI may be more important than shape; however, is it true in profile where shape cues may be stronger? There is also the question of whether men and women have the same perception of female physical attractiveness. Some studies have suggested that they do not, but this runs contrary to mate selection theory. This predicts that women will have the same perception of female attractiveness as men do. This allows them to judge their own relative value, with respect to their peer group, and match this value with the value of a prospective mate. To clarify these issues we asked 40 male and 40 female undergraduates to rate a set of pictures of real women (50 in front-view and 50 in profile) for attractiveness. BMI was the primary predictor of attractiveness in both front and profile, and the putative visual cues to BMI showed a higher degree of view-invariance than shape cues such as the waist-hip ratio (WHR). Consistent with mate selection theory, there were no significant differences in the rating of attractiveness by male and female raters.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 11802880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1269


  3 in total

1.  Predicting the reward value of faces and bodies from social perception.

Authors:  Danielle Morrison; Hongyi Wang; Amanda C Hahn; Benedict C Jones; Lisa M DeBruine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Sexual dimorphism of the pelvic architecture: a struggling response to destructive and parsimonious forces by natural & mate selection.

Authors:  Aaron Leong
Journal:  Mcgill J Med       Date:  2006-01

3.  The relationship of female physical attractiveness to body fatness.

Authors:  Guanlin Wang; Kurosh Djafarian; Chima A Egedigwe; Asmaa El Hamdouchi; Robert Ojiambo; Harris Ramuth; Sandra Johanna Wallner-Liebmann; Sonja Lackner; Adama Diouf; Justina Sauciuvenaite; Catherine Hambly; Lobke M Vaanholt; Mark D Faries; John R Speakman
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.984

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.