OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: An estimated 500,000 patients per year in the United States. are affected by stroke-related dysphagia. Approximately half experience aspiration, which can lead to pneumonia or death. Aspiration may result from many factors, including delayed transport of the bolus, faulty laryngeal elevation, and poor coordination or inappropriate timing of vocal cord closure. Interventions carried out to protect the lungs are usually irreversible, destructive to the upper airway, and rarely prevent the need for enteral tube feeding. STUDY DESIGN: We present a report of the first implantations of a new device in an FDA-approved study to restore dynamic laryngotracheal separation. Two stroke patients needing tracheostomy were selected based on chronic aspiration verified by clinical and radiologic criteria (modified barium swallow [MBS]). METHODS: The left recurrent laryngeal nerve was exposed and electrically stimulated to verify vocal fold adduction. Huntington Medical Research Institute Bipolar Helical Electrodes were then implanted around the nerve. The leads were tunneled and linked to a NeuroControl Implantable Receiver-Stimulator placed subcutaneously on the chest wall. Activation of the stimulator was performed through an external transmitter linked by induction. RESULTS: The device was successfully triggered intra- and postoperatively. Serial flexible fiberoptic endoscopies and MBS demonstrate that aspiration is systematically arrested using low levels of electrical stimulation (42 Hz, 48-100 microsec, 1 mA). DISCUSSION: This pioneering work has shown that aspiration can be controlled without airway damage for a wide population of neurologically impaired patients because it appears more physiological than standard therapies. CONCLUSION: Based on the first two patients, paced laryngotracheal separation is clinically effective in controlling aspiration.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: An estimated 500,000 patients per year in the United States. are affected by stroke-related dysphagia. Approximately half experience aspiration, which can lead to pneumonia or death. Aspiration may result from many factors, including delayed transport of the bolus, faulty laryngeal elevation, and poor coordination or inappropriate timing of vocal cord closure. Interventions carried out to protect the lungs are usually irreversible, destructive to the upper airway, and rarely prevent the need for enteral tube feeding. STUDY DESIGN: We present a report of the first implantations of a new device in an FDA-approved study to restore dynamic laryngotracheal separation. Two strokepatients needing tracheostomy were selected based on chronic aspiration verified by clinical and radiologic criteria (modified barium swallow [MBS]). METHODS: The left recurrent laryngeal nerve was exposed and electrically stimulated to verify vocal fold adduction. Huntington Medical Research Institute Bipolar Helical Electrodes were then implanted around the nerve. The leads were tunneled and linked to a NeuroControl Implantable Receiver-Stimulator placed subcutaneously on the chest wall. Activation of the stimulator was performed through an external transmitter linked by induction. RESULTS: The device was successfully triggered intra- and postoperatively. Serial flexible fiberoptic endoscopies and MBS demonstrate that aspiration is systematically arrested using low levels of electrical stimulation (42 Hz, 48-100 microsec, 1 mA). DISCUSSION: This pioneering work has shown that aspiration can be controlled without airway damage for a wide population of neurologically impairedpatients because it appears more physiological than standard therapies. CONCLUSION: Based on the first two patients, paced laryngotracheal separation is clinically effective in controlling aspiration.
Authors: Ianessa A Humbert; Christopher J Poletto; Keith G Saxon; Pamela R Kearney; Christy L Ludlow Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Nikolay Sapundzhiev; György Lichtenberger; Hans Edmund Eckel; Gerhard Friedrich; Ivan Zenev; Robert J Toohill; Jochen Alfred Werner Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2008-04-17 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Karen M Vernau; Stanley L Marks; Maggie A Kuhn; William T N Culp; Tammy J Owens; G Diane Shelton; Tausif Siddiqui; Rachel Pollard; Peter C Belafsky Journal: Can Vet J Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 1.008
Authors: Michelle G M H Florie; Walmari Pilz; Remco H Dijkman; Bernd Kremer; Anke Wiersma; Bjorn Winkens; Laura W J Baijens Journal: Dysphagia Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 3.438