Literature DB >> 11801927

5196 mandible fractures among 4381 active duty army soldiers, 1980 to 1998.

J R Boole1, M Holtel, P Amoroso, M Yore.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We present the frequencies of various types of mandibular fractures along with associated mechanisms and injuries.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 5196 mandible fractures in 4381 patients extracted from the Total Army Injury and Health Outcomes Database (TAIHOD), a comprehensive database developed by the U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine (USARIEM) that links population data to all hospitalizations among active duty army soldiers. The database is based on the ICD-9 CM coding system.
RESULTS: We found the following frequencies for specific mandible fracture locations: angle 35.6%, symphysis 20.1%, subcondylar 14.2%, body 12.7%, condylar process 9.1%, ramus 4.5%, alveolar border 2.7%, and coronoid process 1%. The mechanisms of injury were separated into seven categories. Fighting accounts for 36.2%, automobile accidents for 18.6%, athletics for 13.6%, falls for 9.7%, motorcycle accidents for 3.1%, other land transport accidents for 3%, and miscellaneous causes for 15.8%. A few fracture locations appear to be associated with specific mechanisms. Of 82 alveolar border fractures with known mechanisms, 37% resulted from automobile accidents. Of 1094 angle fractures with known mechanisms, 48.6% resulted from fighting. Our data show that the majority of fractures were isolated to one location. Only one fracture was recorded for 70.6%, 29.2% have two fractures recorded, 0.2% have three or more fractures recorded. Associated injuries were common and include facial lacerations 1236 (28.2%), non-mandible facial bone fractures 733 (16.7%), intracranial injury 403(9.2%), internal injuries 229 (5.2%), fractures of the upper limb 295 (6.7%), fractures of the lower extremity 302 (6.9%), and cervical fractures 34 (0.8%).
CONCLUSIONS: The mechanism of injury is important in determining the most likely resultant mandible fracture in the case of angle of mandible and alveolar ridge fractures. The clinician should maintain a high level of suspicion for associated injuries that occur more than one fourth of the time and even more frequently in motor vehicle accident victims. Associated intracranial injury is particularly important to rule out. Associated facial fractures, intracranial injury, internal injuries, and extremity injuries are all more common than cervical fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11801927     DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200110000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  12 in total

1.  A randomized controlled trial to compare functional, combined rigid and functional and rigid fixation in double mandibular fractures.

Authors:  Sandeep Pandey; Poonam Yadav; Ajoy Roychoudhury; Ongkila Bhutia; Devalina Goswami
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2022-02-22

2.  A Prospective Study of Strut versus Miniplate for Fractures of Mandibular Angle.

Authors:  Amy S Xue; John C Koshy; Erik M Wolfswinkel; William M Weathers; Kristina P Marsack; Larry H Hollier
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2013-06-24

3.  Management of Mandible Fracture by Plating and Wiring: An Otolaryngologist Perspective at Teritiary Care Center.

Authors:  Sushil G Jha; Vikas Sinha; T U Samanth; Swati Dadhich
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-04-10

4.  Fracture properties of the human mandible.

Authors:  M Unnewehr; C Homann; P F Schmidt; P Sotony; G Fischer; B Brinkmann; T Bajanowski; A DuChesne
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Unifocal versus multifocal mandibular fractures and injury location.

Authors:  Karen Buch; Adham Mottalib; Rohini N Nadgir; Akifumi Fujita; Kotaro Sekiya; Al Ozonoff; Osamu Sakai
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-01-21

6.  Mandibular Ramus Fractures: A Proposed Classification.

Authors:  Padmanidhi Agarwal; Divya Mehrotra
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-02-10

7.  Unusual unilateral fracture of the condylar and coronoid processes of the mandible.

Authors:  Timuçin Baykul; M Asım Aydın; Müge Çına Aksoy; Yavuz Fındık
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2014-09-29

8.  A study of mandibular fractures over a 5-year period of time: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Ashish Vyas; Utpal Mazumdar; Firoz Khan; Madhura Mehra; Laveena Parihar; Chandni Purohit
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2014-10

9.  Mandibular fractures: a comparative analysis between young and adult patients in the southeast region of Turkey.

Authors:  Serhat Atilgan; Behçet Erol; Ferhan Yaman; Nezih Yilmaz; Musa Can Ucan
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

10.  Mandibular Ramus Fracture: An Overview of Rare Anatomical Subsite.

Authors:  Anendd Jadhav; Bhushan Mundada; Rahul Deshmukh; Umesh Bhutekar; Atul Kala; Kapil Waghwani; Apoorva Mishra
Journal:  Plast Surg Int       Date:  2015-11-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.