Literature DB >> 11801747

Evolution of eukaryotic translation elongation and termination factors: variations of evolutionary rate and genetic code deviations.

David Moreira1, Stéphanie Kervestin, Olivier Jean-Jean, Hervé Philippe.   

Abstract

Translation is carried out by the ribosome and several associated protein factors through three consecutive steps: initiation, elongation, and termination. Termination remains the least understood of them, partly because of the nonuniversality of the factors involved. To get some insights on the evolution of eukaryotic translation termination, we have compared the phylogeny of the release factors eRF1 and eRF3 to that of the elongation factors EF-1alpha and EF-2, with special focus on ciliates. Our results show that these four translation proteins have experienced different modes of evolution. This is especially evident for the EF-1alpha, EF-2, and eRF1 ciliate sequences. Ciliates appear as monophyletic in the EF-2 phylogenetic tree but not in the EF-1alpha and eRF1 phylogenetic trees. This seems to be mainly because of phylogeny reconstruction artifacts (the long-branch attraction) produced by the acceleration of evolutionary rate of ciliate EF-1alpha and eRF1 sequences. Interaction with the highly divergent actin found in ciliates, or on the contrary, loss of interaction, could explain the acceleration of the evolutionary rate of the EF-1alpha sequences. In the case of ciliate eRF1 sequences, their unusually high evolutionary rate may be related to the deviations in the genetic code usage found in diverse ciliates. These deviations involve a relaxation (or even abolition) of the recognition of one or two stop codons by eRF1. To achieve this, structural changes in eRF1 are needed, and this may affect its evolutionary rate. Eukaryotic translation seems to have followed a mosaic evolution, with its different elements governed by different selective pressures. However, a correlation analysis shows that, beneath the disagreement shown by the different translation proteins, their concerted evolution can still be made apparent when they are compared with other proteins that are not involved in translation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11801747     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  6 in total

1.  Different modes of stop codon restriction by the Stylonychia and Paramecium eRF1 translation termination factors.

Authors:  Sergey Lekomtsev; Petr Kolosov; Laure Bidou; Ludmila Frolova; Jean-Pierre Rousset; Lev Kisselev
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Evolution and diversification of the organellar release factor family.

Authors:  Isabel Duarte; Sander B Nabuurs; Ramiro Magno; Martijn Huynen
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Release factor one is nonessential in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  David B F Johnson; Chong Wang; Jianfeng Xu; Matthew D Schultz; Robert J Schmitz; Joseph R Ecker; Lei Wang
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 5.100

4.  On the Diversification of the Translation Apparatus across Eukaryotes.

Authors:  Greco Hernández; Christopher G Proud; Thomas Preiss; Armen Parsyan
Journal:  Comp Funct Genomics       Date:  2012-05-14

5.  The largest subunit of RNA polymerase II from the Glaucocystophyta: functional constraint and short-branch exclusion in deep eukaryotic phylogeny.

Authors:  John W Stiller; Leslie Harrell
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  Evaluation of the models handling heterotachy in phylogenetic inference.

Authors:  Yan Zhou; Nicolas Rodrigue; Nicolas Lartillot; Hervé Philippe
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 3.260

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.