Literature DB >> 11801564

In Vitro schedule-dependent interactions between the multitargeted antifolate LY231514 and gemcitabine in human colon adenocarcinoma cell lines.

Anna Tesei1, Luca Ricotti, Franca De Paola, Dino Amadori, Giovanni L Frassineti, Wainer Zoli.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Multitargeted antifolate (MTA) and gemcitabine (GEM) have shown preclinical and clinical activity in tumor histotypes such as colon, renal, small and non-small cell lung cancers, hepatomas and carcinoid tumors. In our study, we investigated the cytotoxic activity of MTA alone or in combination with GEM using different exposure schedules in three different colon cancer cell lines (LoVo, WiDr, and LRWZ). EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Cytotoxic activity was evaluated by sulforhodamine B assay, cell cycle perturbations and apoptosis were evaluated by flow cytometry, and thymidylate synthase expression was evaluated by immunohistochemical method.
RESULTS: A 48-h exposure to MTA caused a minimal and no-dose-response effect on the three cell lines used. Flow cytometric analysis showed a cell accumulation in S phase that completely resolved in LoVo and LRWZ cell lines and persisted in WiDr cells after a 48-h washout. Moreover, a significant increase in thymidilate synthase expression was observed in all of the cell lines after MTA exposure. Among the different combinations tested, the highest synergistic interaction, assessed using Kern's method and expressed as the synergistic ratio index, was produced by pretreatment with GEM followed by MTA (ratio index: 1.3- 6.7). It is possible that the depletion of nucleotide pools induced by MTA and required for DNA synthesis prevented cells from repairing DNA damage caused by GEM. The type and degree of drug interactions were not paralleled by apoptosis, which was almost always negligible, or by the type and persistency of the cell cycle perturbations.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the sequential administration of GEM --> MTA provides the greatest benefit in the clinical treatment of colon cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11801564

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  4 in total

1.  Combination treatment of CC531-lac-Z rat liver metastases by chemoembolization with pemetrexed disodium and gemcitabine.

Authors:  Michael Rodenbach; Ergül Eyol; Matthias H Seelig; Martin R Berger
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  In vitro study on the schedule-dependency of the interaction between pemetrexed, gemcitabine and irradiation in non-small cell lung cancer and head and neck cancer cells.

Authors:  An Wouters; Bea Pauwels; Filip Lardon; Greet G O Pattyn; Hilde A J Lambrechts; Marc Baay; Paul Meijnders; Jan B Vermorken
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  In vitro synergistic cytotoxicity of gemcitabine and pemetrexed and pharmacogenetic evaluation of response to gemcitabine in bladder cancer patients.

Authors:  V Mey; E Giovannetti; F De Braud; S Nannizzi; G Curigliano; F Verweij; O De Cobelli; S Pece; M Del Tacca; R Danesi
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-07-25       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  A preclinical evaluation of pemetrexed and irinotecan combination as second-line chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  A Mercalli; V Sordi; R Formicola; M Dandrea; S Beghelli; A Scarpa; V Di Carlo; M Reni; L Piemonti
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 7.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.