Literature DB >> 11799707

The Hong Kong Bridge Protocol. Immediate loading of mandibular Brånemark fixtures using a fixed provisional prosthesis: preliminary results.

J Chow1, E Hui, J Liu, D Li, P Wat, W Li, Y K Yau, H Law.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Brånemark System Classic is well documented for its successful and predictable results in dental implant rehabilitation. However, the classic two-stage protocol is associated with problems, such as long treatment time and high treatment cost. To overcome these problems, new developments, including early functional loading protocol and Brånemark System Novum, have been introduced by various groups of researchers. In Hong Kong, a protocol has been developed to immediately load the Brånemark System fixtures with a fixed provisional prosthesis.
PURPOSE: The goal of this prospective study was to present the Hong Kong Bridge protocol and report the short-term evaluation of this protocol in a group of patients who had undergone dental implant treatment for their edentulous mandibles.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven consecutive patients being treated at the Hong Kong Osseointegration Implant Centre between June 1998 and December 2000 were included in this study. A total of 123 Brånemark System fixtures were installed and regularly followed up for 3 to 30 months. The prosthesis stability and the marginal bone level were regularly evaluated clinically and radiographically, respectively, after the implant surgery.
RESULTS: Fifteen of the 27 patients had been followed up for 1 year or longer. Two patients with eight fixtures were withdrawn from the study. Two of the 115 remaining fixtures failed, resulting in an overall implant survival rate of 98.3%. The mean marginal bone change was reported on 49 fixtures that had passed the 1-year review. The mean marginal bone loss was 0.60 mm (p < .05) after 1 year of functional loading.
CONCLUSIONS: To load the mandibular Brånemark System fixtures immediately according to the Hong Kong Bridge protocol was a predictable and simple method with good results during this preliminary study period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11799707     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2001.tb00137.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  4 in total

1.  Protocol for mandibular reconstruction with zygomatic implants (zygomatic mandibular implant).

Authors:  Ruben Muñoz; Golaszewski Gajos; Jose Bladimir; Diaz Carvajal; Alvaro Luis; Grace Del Valle Speranza
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-10-28

Review 2.  The use of three implants to support a fixed prosthesis in the management of the edentulous mandible: a systematic review.

Authors:  Murtaza Hirani; Maria Devine; Olamide Obisesan; Cathy Bryant
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-06-17

3.  Clinical outcome of narrow diameter implants inserted into allografts.

Authors:  Maurizio Franco; Alessandro Viscioni; Leone Rigo; Riccardo Guidi; Ilaria Zollino; Anna Avantaggiato; Francesco Carinci
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

4.  Mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses supported by three-dental-implants: A protocol of an overview of reviews.

Authors:  Kelvin I Afrashtehfar; Rosalin A Moawad; Afaf W F-Eddin; Hom-Lay Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.