Literature DB >> 11799678

The effect of air resistance on the jumping performance of insects.

H C Bennet-Clark1, G M Alder.   

Abstract

A spring gun was constructed to propel objects at known velocities of between 1 and 4.5 m.s-1. This was used to project insects and various models in a vertical trajectory. By comparing the height attained in air by the insects or models with the height theoretically possible in vacuo, the energy lost against air resistance was observed. Small insects have a higher frontal area to mass ratio than larger ones so have relatively more aerodynamic drag and attain lower heights. The observed effect may be expressed in terms of the drag coefficient, CD. Fleas and locusts have CD of about 1. Winged flies have CD of about 1.5 which falls to about 1 when the wings are amputated and to about 0.8 when the legs are amputated. Aptery is advantageous in jumping insects. From experiments with models, it appears that the optimal condition for small jumping insects is that the body should be as compact as possible to reduce the frontal area to mass ratio. Thus dense spherical bodies are favoured. Some species of jumping insect have densities of about 1 mg.mm-3 while some flying beetles and flies have densities between 0.3 and 0.8 mg.mm-3. The Reynolds number at which the experiments were performed was from 65-205 for fleas up to 740-2340 for locusts. The models operated in similar ranges. At a velocity which would propel a larger animal to a height of 1 m, fleas weighing 0.4 mg only reach about 0.4 m. At lower initial velocities, proportionately less energy is wasted against air resistance so the jump efficiency is higher. Most fleas jump to a height of about 0.1 m with an efficiency of 0.8 while locusts jump to a height of 0.35 m with an efficiency of over 0.9. Air resistance is thus an important scale effect in jumping insects and provides its own design constraints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 11799678     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.82.1.105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  7 in total

1.  Multifunctionality and mechanical origins: ballistic jaw propulsion in trap-jaw ants.

Authors:  S N Patek; J E Baio; B L Fisher; A V Suarez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Engineered jumpers overcome biological limits via work multiplication.

Authors:  Elliot W Hawkes; Charles Xiao; Richard-Alexandre Peloquin; Christopher Keeley; Matthew R Begley; Morgan T Pope; Günter Niemeyer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  More than a safety line: jump-stabilizing silk of salticids.

Authors:  Yung-Kang Chen; Chen-Pan Liao; Feng-Yueh Tsai; Kai-Jung Chi
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  The Effect of Ground Type on the Jump Performance of Adults of the Locust Locusta migratoria manilensis: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Chao Wan; Rentian Cao; Zhixiu Hao
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 2.769

5.  The effects of temperature and body mass on jump performance of the locust Locusta migratoria.

Authors:  Edward P Snelling; Christie L Becker; Roger S Seymour
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Take-off speed in jumping mantises depends on body size and a power-limited mechanism.

Authors:  G P Sutton; M Doroshenko; D A Cullen; M Burrows
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Impact of Different Developmental Instars on Locusta migratoria Jumping Performance.

Authors:  Xiaojuan Mo; Donato Romano; Mario Milazzo; Giovanni Benelli; Wenjie Ge; Cesare Stefanini
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 1.781

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.