Literature DB >> 11799580

Clinical interpretation of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic propofol-opioid interactions.

J Vuyk1.   

Abstract

This manuscript describes the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between propofol and the opioids. PHARMACOKINETIC INTERACTIONS: In vitro studies describe the reduced clearance of opioids in the presence of propofol, midazolam and etomidate due to interaction at the cytochrome P450 enzyme system. In vivo, however, pharmacokinetic interaction studies by mixed effects modelling predominantly focus on haemodynamic factors affecting distribution and elimination of concomitantly administered agents. In the presence of propofol the elimination clearance and rapid and slow distribution clearance of alfentanil is decreased. Consequently, plasma alfentanil concentrations are increased in the presence of propofol. Vice versa alfentanil reduces propofol elimination clearance and increases the deep volume of distribution. PHARMACODYNAMIC INTERACTIONS: Propofol and the opioids interact in a synergistic manner for various clinical end points. The magnitude of interaction is similar between the various opioids and hypnotic agents, taken into consideration the differences in potency between the opioids. CLINICAL INTERPRETATION OF PK/PD INTERACTIONS: A. Speed of induction. Using PK/PD interaction data speed of induction can be optimised. Of importance are the magnitude of PD interaction between propofol and the various opioids, the rate of administration and the time to peak effect of the agents involved. B. Haemodynamic stability. In ASA 1-2 patients the opioid induced hypnotic dose reduction is not associated with an increased haemodynamic stability of induction of loss of consciousness. In elderly patients or patients known with cardiovascular instability high opioid-low propofol anaesthesia may be associated with improved haemodynamic stability during induction of anaesthesia, however, no data are available regarding this yet. C. Speed of recovery. Time to return of consciousness after termination of propofol-opioid infusions of various duration can be reduced using optimal propofol-opioid concentrations. In general, optimal propofol target concentrations to assure this are 5 micrograms/ml in the presence of fentanyl, 3.5 micrograms/ml in the presence of alfentanil and sufentanil and 2.5 micrograms/ml in the presence of remifentanil. D. Spontaneous respiration. For single agents some data allow proper targeting of a drug concentration that is associated with adequate intraoperative respiration. However, no data exist on drug interactions regarding the respiratory depressant effects of hypnotic-opioid combinations.
CONCLUSION: The proper exploration and use of published pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interaction data allows the clinical anaesthesiologist to optimise the clinical administration of propofol and the various opioids when given alone or in combination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11799580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Belg        ISSN: 0001-5164


  9 in total

1.  Population pharmacokinetics and analgesic potency of oxycodone.

Authors:  Byung-Moon Choi; Yong-Hun Lee; Sang-Mee An; Soo-Han Lee; Eun-Kyung Lee; Gyu-Jeong Noh
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of medications used for moderate sedation.

Authors:  Tong J Gan
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Potential inhibition of cytochrome P450 3A4 by propofol in human primary hepatocytes.

Authors:  Li-Qun Yang; Wei-Feng Yu; Yun-Fei Cao; Bin Gong; Qing Chang; Guang-Shun Yang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Different alterations of cytochrome P450 3A4 isoform and its gene expression in livers of patients with chronic liver diseases.

Authors:  Li-Qun Yang; Shen-Jing Li; Yun-Fei Cao; Xiao-Bo Man; Wei-Feng Yu; Hong-Yang Wang; Meng-Chao Wu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Comparison of total intravenous anaesthesia using propofol with or without sufentanil in laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

Authors:  M Subrahmanyam; B Sreelakshmi
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2009-08

6.  Spectral frequency index monitoring during propofol-remifentanil and propofol-alfentanil total intravenous anaesthesia.

Authors:  Zbigniew Zaba; Agnieszka Bienert; Leon Drobnik; Stanislaw Dyderski; Krzysztof Kusza
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.749

7.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol in cancer patients undergoing major lung surgery.

Authors:  Krzysztof Przybyłowski; Joanna Tyczka; Damian Szczesny; Agnieszka Bienert; Paweł Wiczling; Katarzyna Kut; Emilia Plenzler; Roman Kaliszan; Edmund Grześkowiak
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.745

8.  Effect of varying time intervals between fentanyl and propofol administration on propofol requirement for induction of anaesthesia: Randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Vanlal Darlong; Anirban Som; Dalim K Baidya; Ravindra Pandey; Jyotsna Punj; Aparna Pande
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2019-10-10

9.  Influence of propofol on the electroencephalogram default mode network in patients of advanced age.

Authors:  Jing-Dong Ke; Min Xu; Pei-Pei Wang; Min Wang; Ming Tian; Andrew C N Chen
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2018-09-23       Impact factor: 1.671

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.