Literature DB >> 11799500

Multimodal analgesia and intravenous nutrition preserves total body protein following major upper gastrointestinal surgery.

Stephen McG Barratt1, Ross C Smith, Anthony J Kee, Laurence E Mather, Michael J Cousins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study examined whether perioperative multimodal analgesia (MMA) improves the effectiveness of intravenous nutrition (IVN) as a means of preventing protein wasting following major upper abdominal surgery (UAS). The MMA regimen utilized combined epidural opioid/local anesthetic and the systemic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) ketorolac for 48 hours.
METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, nonblinded study, 47 patients scheduled for major UAS were allocated to receive the following: MMA +/- intravenous lipid-based nutrition (IVN) or patient-controlled analgesia with opioids (PCA) +/- IVN. Pain scores, nitrogen balance, total body protein (TBP), arterial blood gases, and various hormones were measured.
RESULTS: Pain control was significantly better in the MMA patients at rest and coughing. Only the MMA + IVN group maintained TBP, mean (+/-95% confidence interval) preoperative day 1, 10.5 (+/-1.0) kg; day 14, 10.7 (+/-1.2) kg, whereas TBP decreased in the other groups (P =.04). Nitrogen balance was significantly greater in patients receiving IVN on day 7 (P =.01), but there was no effect related to the analgetic regimen. Decreased PaO(2) seen on postoperative day 2 was not prevented by MMA. The hormonal response to surgery was not influenced by treatment modality, apart from a return to postprandial insulin levels on postoperative day 7 in those patients receiving IVN (P =.002).
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, we have shown that the combination of MMA and IVN prevents protein loss and improves pain control after major UAS. Our results suggest that after UAS, MMA significantly reduced pain and, in combination with IVN, preserves total body protein and fat. This is the first direct evidence of such effects associated with a commonly used multimodal regimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11799500     DOI: 10.1053/rapm.2002.27850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med        ISSN: 1098-7339            Impact factor:   6.288


  6 in total

Review 1.  Nutrition support in hospitalised adults at nutritional risk.

Authors:  Joshua Feinberg; Emil Eik Nielsen; Steven Kwasi Korang; Kirstine Halberg Engell; Marie Skøtt Nielsen; Kang Zhang; Maria Didriksen; Lisbeth Lund; Niklas Lindahl; Sara Hallum; Ning Liang; Wenjing Xiong; Xuemei Yang; Pernille Brunsgaard; Alexandre Garioud; Sanam Safi; Jane Lindschou; Jens Kondrup; Christian Gluud; Janus C Jakobsen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-05-19

2.  Audit of a ward-based patient-controlled epidural analgesia service in Ireland.

Authors:  T Tan; D Wilson; A Walsh; P Hu; C Power
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Postoperative protein sparing with epidural analgesia and hypocaloric dextrose.

Authors:  Thomas Schricker; Sarkis Meterissian; Linda Wykes; Leopold Eberhart; Ralph Lattermann; Franco Carli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Understanding the mechanisms and treatment options in cancer cachexia.

Authors:  Kenneth Fearon; Jann Arends; Vickie Baracos
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for pain following intra-abdominal surgery in adults.

Authors:  Jon H Salicath; Emily Cy Yeoh; Michael H Bennett
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-08-30

Review 6.  Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens for postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, vomiting and pain after abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Joanne Guay; Mina Nishimori; Sandra Kopp
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.