Literature DB >> 11797957

The effect of scattering foil parameters on electron-beam Monte Carlo calculations.

M R Bieda1, J A Antolak, K R Hogstrom.   

Abstract

The sensitivity of electron-beam Monte Carlo dose calculations to scattering foil geometrical parameters is described. A method for resolving discrepancies between Monte Carlo calculation and measured data in a systematic manner is also described. As part of a project to investigate the utility of Monte Carlo methods for calculating data required for commissioning electron beams, a large discrepancy between measured and calculated 20 MeV cross-beam profiles for the largest field size was found. It was hypothesized that the discrepancy was due to incorrect input data and that better agreement between calculation and measurement could be achieved with small changes in the scattering foil system geometry. Four parameters describing the foil system were varied individually until better agreement between calculation and measurement was achieved, and the percentage change in the parameter was tabulated as an indication of the sensitivity of the model to that parameter. The accelerator model for the 20 MeV electron beam was most sensitive to the distance between the scattering foils and to a slightly lesser extent, to the width of the shaped secondary scattering foil. Changes to the primary or secondary foil thickness also significantly modified the falloff and bremsstrahlung component of depth dose, which was unacceptable for the present case. Therefore, the distance between the two scattering foils was changed in our calculations, which the manufacturer later confirmed was indeed the case. For 6 and 12 MeV electron beams, the change was not nearly as significant. It was concluded that Monte Carlo calculations for higher-energy beams and larger field sizes are most sensitive to the geometric configuration of the scattering foil system and should therefore be calculated first to help verify the accuracy of the geometric information.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11797957     DOI: 10.1118/1.1420387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  6 in total

1.  Electron modulated arc therapy (EMAT) using photon MLC for postmastectomy chest wall treatment I: Monte Carlo-based dosimetric characterizations.

Authors:  Chaoqiong Ma; David Parsons; Mingli Chen; Steve Jiang; Qing Hou; Xuejun Gu; Weiguo Lu
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 2.685

2.  Design and evaluation of electron beam energy degraders for breast boost irradiation.

Authors:  Jong In Park; Sung Whan Ha; Jung-In Kim; Hyunseok Lee; Jaegi Lee; Il Han Kim; Sung-Joon Ye
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.481

3.  Sensitivity analysis of an asymmetric Monte Carlo beam model of a Siemens Primus accelerator.

Authors:  Eric C Schreiber; Daren L Sawkey; Bruce A Faddegon
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Nontarget and Out-of-Field Doses from Electron Beam Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Natalia Matuszak; Marta Kruszyna-Mochalska; Agnieszka Skrobala; Adam Ryczkowski; Piotr Romanski; Igor Piotrowski; Katarzyna Kulcenty; Wiktoria Maria Suchorska; Julian Malicki
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-08

5.  Monte Carlo N Particle code - Dose distribution of clinical electron beams in inhomogeneous phantoms.

Authors:  H A Nedaie; M A Mosleh-Shirazi; M Allahverdi
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2013-01

6.  Modeling the head of PRIMUS linear accelerator for electron-mode at 10 MeV for different applicators.

Authors:  Hani Negm; Moamen M O M Aly; Walaa M Fathy
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.