Literature DB >> 11797873

New Zealand rural general practitioners 1999 survey--part 1: an overview of the rural doctor workforce and their concerns.

R Janes1, A Dowell, D Cormack.   

Abstract

AIMS: To obtain current information about New Zealand rural general practitioners (GPs) and their localitites.
METHODS: An anonymous postal questionnaire was mailed out to 559 rural and semi-rural GPs in November 1999, and non-responders were sent three reminders.
RESULTS: Of the 417 completed questionnaires returned (response rate 75%), 338 were from rural GPs(Rural Ranking Scale score > or = 35 points) and these formed the study group. The mean age was 44 years, 72% were male, and 93% were of New Zealand European ethnicity. Less than 50%had graduated from a New Zealand medical school with Britain (30%) and South Africa (11%) providing most of the foreign- trained rural GPs. Only 59% had received vocational training in general practice. The majority worked fulltime (79%) and owned their practice (78%), while 133 (39%) worked part time as rural hospital doctors and 72 (21%) provided intra-partum obstetric care. Over two thirds rated lack of locum relief, onerous oncall,and rural GP shortages as 'important' or 'very important' problems, with one third stating that more rural GPswere needed in their locality.
CONCLUSIONS: This, only the second national survey of rural GPs, provides a comprehensive overview of New Zealand rural general practice in November 1999. It confirms that the major current problem is an under supply of rural GPs, causing overwork and stress in those remaining.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11797873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Z Med J        ISSN: 0028-8446


  3 in total

1.  A comparison of the workload of rural and urban primary care physicians in Germany: analysis of a questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Jost Steinhaeuser; Stefanie Joos; Joachim Szecsenyi; Antje Miksch
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 2.497

2.  Rural area in a European country from a health care point of view: an adoption of the Rural Ranking Scale.

Authors:  Jost Steinhaeuser; Petra Otto; Katja Goetz; Joachim Szecsenyi; Stefanie Joos
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 3.  Working Time Society consensus statements: Evidence-based effects of shift work and non-standard working hours on workers, family and community.

Authors:  Anna Arlinghaus; Philip Bohle; Irena Iskra-Golec; Nicole Jansen; Sarah Jay; Lucia Rotenberg
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.179

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.