Literature DB >> 11797093

Movement preparation and working memory: a behavioural dissociation.

Ivan Toni1, Daniel Thoenissen, Karl Zilles, Michael Niedeggen.   

Abstract

We can cross temporal sensorimotor contingencies by remembering sensory events or by anticipating motor responses. Here we tested the hypothesis that sensory and motor representations can be accessed according to different temporal dynamics. We predicted that the manipulation of movement representations would lead to a performance independent from the length of a delay interposed between sensory instructions and behavioural responses. Conversely, we expected a delay-dependent performance whenever temporary storage of sensory information was necessary to solve the task. We have measured reaction times and error rate in subjects performing a delayed non-matching to sample task. Task contingencies rather than explicit instructions ensured that either sensory or motor representations were used to cross the delay period on each trial. We tested our hypothesis by manipulating the length of the delays between stimulus presentation and behavioural response. We found that carrying sensory material over temporal gaps affects performance as a non-linear function of time, whereas movement representations remain robust over a wide range of delays. This novel behavioural paradigm might prove effective in dissociating the neural bases of preparatory and mnestic processes in normal human subjects, as well as their disorders in neurological patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11797093     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-001-0933-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  4 in total

1.  Differential involvement of parietal and precentral regions in movement preparation and motor intention.

Authors:  Daniel Thoenissen; Karl Zilles; Ivan Toni
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Translating working memory into action: behavioral and neural evidence for using motor representations in encoding visuo-spatial sequences.

Authors:  Robert Langner; Melanie A Sternkopf; Tanja S Kellermann; Christian Grefkes; Florian Kurth; Frank Schneider; Karl Zilles; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  The influence of input and output modality on following instructions in working memory.

Authors:  Tian-Xiao Yang; Richard J Allen; Qi-Jing Yu; Raymond C K Chan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Functional versus effector-specific organization of the human posterior parietal cortex: revisited.

Authors:  Tobias Heed; Frank T M Leone; Ivan Toni; W Pieter Medendorp
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.714

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.