Literature DB >> 11796572

Strain-dependent differences in the regulatory roles of sarA and agr in Staphylococcus aureus.

Jon S Blevins1, Karen E Beenken, Mohamed O Elasri, Barry K Hurlburt, Mark S Smeltzer.   

Abstract

The accessory gene regulator (agr) and the staphylococcal accessory regulator (sar) are central regulatory elements that control the production of Staphylococcus aureus virulence factors. To date, the functions of these loci have been defined almost exclusively using RN6390, which is representative of the laboratory strain 8325-4. However, RN6390 was recently shown to have a mutation in rsbU that results in a phenotype resembling that of a sigB mutant (I. Kullik et al., J. Bacteriol. 180:4814-4820, 1998). For that reason, it remains unclear whether the regulatory events defined in RN6390 are representative of the events that take place in clinical isolates of S. aureus. To address this issue, we generated mutations in the sarA and agr loci of three laboratory strains (RN6390, Newman, and S6C) and four clinical isolates (UAMS-1, UAMS-601, DB, and SC-1). Mutation of sarA in the cna-positive strains UAMS-1 and UAMS-601 resulted in an increased capacity to bind collagen, while mutation of agr had little impact. Northern blot analysis confirmed that the increase in collagen binding was due to increased cna transcription. Without exception, mutation of sarA resulted in increased production of proteases and a decreased capacity to bind fibronectin. Mutation of agr had the opposite effect. Although mutation of sarA resulted in a slight reduction in fnbA transcription, changes in the ability to bind fibronectin appeared to be more directly correlated with changes in protease activity. Lipase production was reduced in both sarA and agr mutants. While mutation of sarA in RN6390 resulted in reduced hemolytic activity, it had the opposite effect in all other strains. There appeared to be reduced levels of the sarC transcript in RN6390, but there was no difference in the overall pattern of sar transcription or the production of SarA. Although mutation of sarA resulted in decreased RNAIII transcription, this effect was not evident under all growth conditions. Taken together, these results suggest that studies defining the regulatory roles of sarA and agr by using RN6390 are not always representative of the events that occur in clinical isolates of S. aureus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11796572      PMCID: PMC127691          DOI: 10.1128/IAI.70.2.470-480.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Immun        ISSN: 0019-9567            Impact factor:   3.441


  52 in total

1.  Transcriptional analysis of different promoters in the sar locus in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  A C Manna; M G Bayer; A L Cheung
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Role of SarA in virulence determinant production and environmental signal transduction in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  P F Chan; S J Foster
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 3.  Staphylococcal lipases: molecular characterisation, secretion, and processing.

Authors:  F Götz; H M Verheij; R Rosenstein
Journal:  Chem Phys Lipids       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.329

Review 4.  Staphylococcus aureus infections.

Authors:  F D Lowy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-08-20       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Phenotypic characterization of xpr, a global regulator of extracellular virulence factors in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  M S Smeltzer; M E Hart; J J Iandolo
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Deletion of the alternative sigma factor sigmaB in Staphylococcus aureus reveals its function as a global regulator of virulence genes.

Authors:  I Kullik; P Giachino; T Fuchs
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Management and epidemiologic analyses of an outbreak due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  M B Goetz; M E Mulligan; R Kwok; H O'Brien; C Caballes; J P Garcia
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  The accessory gene regulator (agr) controls Staphylococcus aureus virulence in a murine arthritis model.

Authors:  A Abdelnour; S Arvidson; T Bremell; C Rydén; A Tarkowski
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  Regulation of alpha- and beta-hemolysins by the sar locus of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  A L Cheung; P Ying
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Synthesis of staphylococcal virulence factors is controlled by a regulatory RNA molecule.

Authors:  R P Novick; H F Ross; S J Projan; J Kornblum; B Kreiswirth; S Moghazeh
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  96 in total

1.  Mutation of sarA in Staphylococcus aureus limits biofilm formation.

Authors:  Karen E Beenken; Jon S Blevins; Mark S Smeltzer
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Regulatory elements of the Staphylococcus aureus protein A (Spa) promoter.

Authors:  Jinxin Gao; George C Stewart
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Accessory gene regulator control of staphyloccoccal enterotoxin d gene expression.

Authors:  Ching Wen Tseng; Shuping Zhang; George C Stewart
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 4.  Oral multispecies biofilm development and the key role of cell-cell distance.

Authors:  Paul E Kolenbrander; Robert J Palmer; Saravanan Periasamy; Nicholas S Jakubovics
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 60.633

5.  Enhancement of the pathogenicity of Staphylococcus aureus strain Newman by a small noncoding RNA SprX1.

Authors:  Manikandan Kathirvel; Hasmatbanu Buchad; Mrinalini Nair
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Essential role for the major autolysin in the fibronectin-binding protein-mediated Staphylococcus aureus biofilm phenotype.

Authors:  Patrick Houston; Sarah E Rowe; Clarissa Pozzi; Elaine M Waters; James P O'Gara
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 3.441

7.  Global transcriptome analysis of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in response to innate immune cells.

Authors:  Tyler D Scherr; Christelle M Roux; Mark L Hanke; Amanda Angle; Paul M Dunman; Tammy Kielian
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Staphylococcus aureus Rbf activates biofilm formation in vitro and promotes virulence in a murine foreign body infection model.

Authors:  Thanh T Luong; Mei G Lei; Chia Y Lee
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  SarA positively controls bap-dependent biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  María Pilar Trotonda; Adhar C Manna; Ambrose L Cheung; Iñigo Lasa; José R Penadés
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Evaluation of capsular and acapsular strains of S. aureus in an experimental brain abscess model.

Authors:  Nilufer Esen; Gail Wagoner; Napoleon Philips
Journal:  J Neuroimmunol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.478

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.