BACKGROUND: Conflict exists regarding the usefulness of measuring plasma B type natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentrations for identifying impaired left ventricular (LV) systolic function during mass screening. Various cardiac abnormalities, regardless of degree of LV dysfunction, are prone to carry a high risk of cardiovascular events. OBJECTIVE: To examine the validity of plasma BNP measurement for detection of various cardiac abnormalities in a population with a low prevalence of coronary heart disease and LV systolic dysfunction. DESIGN AND SETTING: Participants in this cross sectional study attended a health screening programme in Iwate, northern Japan. Plasma BNP concentrations were determined in 1098 consecutive subjects (mean age 56 years) by direct radioimmunoassay. All subjects underwent multiphasic health checkups including physical examination, ECG, chest radiography, and transthoracic echocardiography. RESULTS: Conventional diagnostic methods showed 39 subjects to have a wide range of cardiac abnormalities: lone atrial fibrillation or flutter in 11; previous myocardial infarction in seven; valvar heart disease in seven; hypertensive heart disease in six; cardiomyopathy in six; atrial septal defect in one; and cor pulmonale in one. No subjects had a low LV ejection fraction (< 40%). To assess the utility of plasma BNP measurement for identification of such patients, receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed. The optimal threshold for identification was a BNP concentration of 50 pg/ml with sensitivity of 89.7% and specificity of 95.7%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.970. The positive and negative predictive values at the cutoff level were 44.3% and 99.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Measurement of plasma BNP concentration is a very efficient and cost effective mass screening technique for identifying patients with various cardiac abnormalities regardless of aetiology and degree of LV systolic dysfunction that can potentially develop into obvious heart failure and carry a high risk of a cardiovascular event.
BACKGROUND: Conflict exists regarding the usefulness of measuring plasma B type natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentrations for identifying impaired left ventricular (LV) systolic function during mass screening. Various cardiac abnormalities, regardless of degree of LV dysfunction, are prone to carry a high risk of cardiovascular events. OBJECTIVE: To examine the validity of plasma BNP measurement for detection of various cardiac abnormalities in a population with a low prevalence of coronary heart disease and LV systolic dysfunction. DESIGN AND SETTING:Participants in this cross sectional study attended a health screening programme in Iwate, northern Japan. Plasma BNP concentrations were determined in 1098 consecutive subjects (mean age 56 years) by direct radioimmunoassay. All subjects underwent multiphasic health checkups including physical examination, ECG, chest radiography, and transthoracic echocardiography. RESULTS: Conventional diagnostic methods showed 39 subjects to have a wide range of cardiac abnormalities: lone atrial fibrillation or flutter in 11; previous myocardial infarction in seven; valvar heart disease in seven; hypertensive heart disease in six; cardiomyopathy in six; atrial septal defect in one; and cor pulmonale in one. No subjects had a low LV ejection fraction (< 40%). To assess the utility of plasma BNP measurement for identification of such patients, receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed. The optimal threshold for identification was a BNP concentration of 50 pg/ml with sensitivity of 89.7% and specificity of 95.7%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.970. The positive and negative predictive values at the cutoff level were 44.3% and 99.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Measurement of plasma BNP concentration is a very efficient and cost effective mass screening technique for identifying patients with various cardiac abnormalities regardless of aetiology and degree of LV systolic dysfunction that can potentially develop into obvious heart failure and carry a high risk of a cardiovascular event.
Authors: T A McDonagh; C E Morrison; A Lawrence; I Ford; H Tunstall-Pedoe; J J McMurray; H J Dargie Journal: Lancet Date: 1997-09-20 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: A Luchner; J C Burnett; M Jougasaki; H W Hense; I M Heid; F Muders; G A Riegger; H Schunkert Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: K MacIntyre; S Capewell; S Stewart; J W Chalmers; J Boyd; A Finlayson; A Redpath; J P Pell; J J McMurray Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-09-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: B J Maron; W K Shen; M S Link; A E Epstein; A K Almquist; J P Daubert; G H Bardy; S Favale; R F Rea; G Boriani; N A Estes; P Spirito Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-02-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: P M Elliott; J Poloniecki; S Dickie; S Sharma; L Monserrat; A Varnava; N G Mahon; W J McKenna Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Paul M McKie; Richard J Rodeheffer; Alessandro Cataliotti; Fernando L Martin; Lynn H Urban; Douglas W Mahoney; Steven J Jacobsen; Margaret M Redfield; John C Burnett Journal: Hypertension Date: 2006-04-03 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Jae Eun Lee; Bum Soo Kim; Wan Park; Jung Kwon Huh; Byung Jin Kim; Ki Chul Sung; Jin Ho Kang; Man Ho Lee; Jung Ro Park Journal: Korean Circ J Date: 2010-04-22 Impact factor: 3.243
Authors: Raquel Cortés; Miguel Rivera; Antonio Salvador; Vicente Bertomeu; Fernando García de Burgos; Esther Roselló-Lletí; Manuel Portolés; Rafael Payá; Luis Martínez-Dolz; Vicente Climent Journal: Heart Date: 2007-05-08 Impact factor: 5.994