OBJECTIVES: To evaluate adhesion formation after urologic laparoscopy, a multi-institutional review was conducted among adult patients who underwent a second procedure after an initial transperitoneal laparoscopic procedure. Adhesion formation after abdominal surgery remains a major cause of postoperative morbidity. Peritoneal adhesions result in hospitalizations and interventions that result in healthcare costs of more than 1 billion dollars annually. The risk of adhesion formation from transperitoneal genitourinary laparoscopy in adults has not been previously studied. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients (mean age 45.5 years, range 24 to 71) were identified who underwent a second laparoscopic procedure after their initial urologic laparoscopic procedure was performed. The mean time between the procedures was 11.4 months (range 8 days to 38 months). At the time of the repeated laparoscopy or open surgery, the peritoneal cavity was examined and mapped for type (grade), extent (length), and location of any adhesions at the operative and trocar sites. The adhesions were graded as 0, no adhesions; 1, flimsy; 2, dense; and 3, cohesive. The extent was graded as 0, no adhesions; 1, less than 2 cm; 2, 2.1 to 10 cm; 3, greater than 10.1 cm. RESULTS: Overall, adhesions occurred in 6 (22.2%) of 27 patients. Operative site adhesions occurred in only 3 (8.2%) of 34 possible operative sites (gastric augmentation cystoplasty, renal cyst ablation, nephropexy). Trocar site adhesions occurred in 4 (3.5%) of 114 possible sites (two nephrectomies, one cyst decortication, and one orchiectomy). All adhesions were classified as grade 1 and extent 1, except for a single grade 2, extent 2 adhesion. In most patients, retroperitonealization occurred with minimal or no scarring noted. None of the patients developed symptoms as a result of the adhesion formation. CONCLUSIONS: Although intraperitoneal adhesions do occur with adult urologic laparoscopy, the incidence is low. Also, in the few patients who do form adhesions, they are flimsy and short. This evidence, when contrasted with the available data on adhesion formation after open surgery, suggests that transperitoneal laparoscopic approaches to genitourinary surgery may have advantages over traditional open transperitoneal approaches by lowering the incidence and severity of adhesion formation.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate adhesion formation after urologic laparoscopy, a multi-institutional review was conducted among adult patients who underwent a second procedure after an initial transperitoneal laparoscopic procedure. Adhesion formation after abdominal surgery remains a major cause of postoperative morbidity. Peritoneal adhesions result in hospitalizations and interventions that result in healthcare costs of more than 1 billion dollars annually. The risk of adhesion formation from transperitoneal genitourinary laparoscopy in adults has not been previously studied. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients (mean age 45.5 years, range 24 to 71) were identified who underwent a second laparoscopic procedure after their initial urologic laparoscopic procedure was performed. The mean time between the procedures was 11.4 months (range 8 days to 38 months). At the time of the repeated laparoscopy or open surgery, the peritoneal cavity was examined and mapped for type (grade), extent (length), and location of any adhesions at the operative and trocar sites. The adhesions were graded as 0, no adhesions; 1, flimsy; 2, dense; and 3, cohesive. The extent was graded as 0, no adhesions; 1, less than 2 cm; 2, 2.1 to 10 cm; 3, greater than 10.1 cm. RESULTS: Overall, adhesions occurred in 6 (22.2%) of 27 patients. Operative site adhesions occurred in only 3 (8.2%) of 34 possible operative sites (gastric augmentation cystoplasty, renal cyst ablation, nephropexy). Trocar site adhesions occurred in 4 (3.5%) of 114 possible sites (two nephrectomies, one cyst decortication, and one orchiectomy). All adhesions were classified as grade 1 and extent 1, except for a single grade 2, extent 2 adhesion. In most patients, retroperitonealization occurred with minimal or no scarring noted. None of the patients developed symptoms as a result of the adhesion formation. CONCLUSIONS: Although intraperitoneal adhesions do occur with adult urologic laparoscopy, the incidence is low. Also, in the few patients who do form adhesions, they are flimsy and short. This evidence, when contrasted with the available data on adhesion formation after open surgery, suggests that transperitoneal laparoscopic approaches to genitourinary surgery may have advantages over traditional open transperitoneal approaches by lowering the incidence and severity of adhesion formation.
Authors: J-U Stolzenburg; M C Truss; R Rabenalt; M Do; H Pfeiffer; A Bekos; J Neuhaus; C G Stief; U Jonas; W Dorschner Journal: Urologe A Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 0.639
Authors: Pierpaolo Sileri; Roberto Sthory; Enda McVeigh; Tim Child; Chris Cunningham; Neil J Mortensen; Ian Lindsey Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2008-02-16 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Ronald S Boris; Gopal N Gupta; Jonas S Benson; W Marston Linehan; Peter A Pinto; Gennady Bratslavsky Journal: J Endourol Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 2.942