Literature DB >> 11795751

The use of titanium mesh cages in the cervical spine.

K Daniel Riew1, John M Rhee.   

Abstract

Titanium mesh cages have been used widely for spinal reconstruction since 1986 when they first were introduced. Despite their popularity, relatively few studies have been published on their use in the cervical spine. These cages can be used as structural devices containing autologous local bone or iliac crest bone graft, obviating the need to harvest large structural bone grafts. The main disadvantages of their use are the increased costs and the difficulty of assessing fusion status. The authors review surgical techniques that can be used using titanium mesh cages in cervical spine applications and discuss some of their advantages and disadvantages.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11795751     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200201000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  19 in total

1.  A new source of structural autograft for ACDF surgery: cervical laminae.

Authors:  Jiaming Liu; Xu Xiong; Xinhua Long; Yong Shu; Shanhu Huang; Dong Yang; Zhili Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-06-15

2.  Anatomy-related risk factors for the subsidence of titanium mesh cage in cervical reconstruction after one-level corpectomy.

Authors:  Jianxin Wu; Dan Luo; Xiaojian Ye; Xuyao Luo; Lisheng Yan; Haiping Qian
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-05-15

3.  [Effects of a new anatomical adaptive titanium mesh cage on supportive load at the cervical endplate: a morphological and biomechanical study].

Authors:  Teng Lu; Zhongyang Gao; Xijing He; Jialiang Li; Ning Liu; Hui Liang; Yibin Wang; Zhijing Wen; Ting Zhang; Dong Wang; Haopeng Li
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2019-04-30

4.  Comparison of anterior cervical fusion by titanium mesh cage versus nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide cage following single-level corpectomy.

Authors:  Xi Yang; Qi Chen; Limin Liu; Yueming Song; Qingquan Kong; Jiancheng Zeng; Youdi Xue; Chunpeng Ren
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Single-blinded prospective randomized study comparing open versus needle technique for obtaining autologous cancellous bone from the iliac crest.

Authors:  Ronald H M A Bartels
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-02-17       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Evaluation of a new type of titanium mesh cage versus the traditional titanium mesh cage for single-level, anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Yu Fengbin; Miao Jinhao; Liao Xinyuan; Wang Xinwei; Chen Yu; Chen Deyu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Radiolucent cage for cervical vertebral reconstruction: a prospective study of 17 cases with 2-year minimum follow-up.

Authors:  C H Söderlund; V Pointillart; M Pedram; G Andrault; J M Vital
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-06-26       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion with a dentate titanium cage: An experimental radiological and histopathological study in pigs.

Authors:  Pd Tsitsopoulos; Cha Tsonidis; Pph Tsitsopoulos; Ai Mintelis; DA Psalla; Ak Desiris
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.471

9.  Cervical cage without plating in management of type II / II A Hangman's fracture combined with intervertebral disc injury.

Authors:  Fuxin Wei; Le Wang; Zhiyu Zhou; Rui Zhong; Shaoyu Liu; Shangbin Cui; Ximin Pan; Manman Gao
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Anterior-only stabilization using cage versus plating with bone autograft for the treatment of type II/IIA Hangman's fracture combined with intervertebral disc injury.

Authors:  Fuxin Wei; Ximin Pan; Zhiyu Zhou; Shangbin Cui; Rui Zhong; Le Wang; Manman Gao; Ningning Chen; Zijian Liang; Xuenong Zou; Sheng Huang; Shaoyu Liu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.