Literature DB >> 11794835

Health information: reconciling personal privacy with the public good of human health.

L O Gostin1.   

Abstract

The success of the health care system depends on the accuracy, correctness and trustworthiness of the information, and the privacy rights of individuals to control the disclosure of personal information. A national policy on health informational privacy should be guided by ethical principles that respect individual autonomy while recognizing the important collective interests in the use of health information. At present there are no adequate laws or constitutional principles to help guide a rational privacy policy. The laws are scattered and fragmented across the states. Constitutional law is highly general, without important specific safeguards. Finally, a case study is provided showing the important trade-offs that exist between public health and privacy. For a model public health law, see www.critpath.org/msphpa/privacy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health; Legal Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11794835     DOI: 10.1023/A:1012905932744

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Anal        ISSN: 1065-3058


  15 in total

1.  Whalen v. Roe. 22 Feb 1977.

Authors: 
Journal:  U S Rep U S Supreme Court       Date:  1977

2.  The Americans with Disabilities Act and the corpus of anti-discrimination law: a force for change in the future of public health regulation.

Authors:  L O Gostin
Journal:  Health Matrix Clevel       Date:  1993

3.  Doe v. Borough of Barrington.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Suppl       Date:  1990-01-29

4.  Ethical values at stake in health care reform.

Authors:  C J Dougherty
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-11-04       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Health services research: public benefits, personal privacy, and proprietary interests.

Authors:  L O Gostin; J Hadley
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  The threat to medical-records research.

Authors:  L J Melton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-11-13       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  National health information privacy: regulations under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.

Authors:  L O Gostin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-06-20       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Effectiveness in health care. An initiative to evaluate and improve medical practice.

Authors:  W L Roper; W Winkenwerder; G M Hackbarth; H Krakauer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-11-03       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  A decision analysis of alternative treatment strategies for clinically localized prostate cancer. Prostate Patient Outcomes Research Team.

Authors:  C Fleming; J H Wasson; P C Albertsen; M J Barry; J E Wennberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-05-26       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  An assessment of radical prostatectomy. Time trends, geographic variation, and outcomes. The Prostate Patient Outcomes Research Team.

Authors:  G L Lu-Yao; D McLerran; J Wasson; J E Wennberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-05-26       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  7 in total

1.  A model for expanded public health reporting in the context of HIPAA.

Authors:  Soumitra Sengupta; Neil S Calman; George Hripcsak
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  The risks of absolute medical confidentiality.

Authors:  M A Crook
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Ethical issues in epidemiologic research and public health practice.

Authors:  Steven S Coughlin
Journal:  Emerg Themes Epidemiol       Date:  2006-10-03

4.  Population attitudes towards research use of health care registries: a population-based survey in Finland.

Authors:  Katariina Eloranta; Anssi Auvinen
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 5.  Health Information Economy: Literature Review.

Authors:  Kamal Ebrahimi; Masoud Roudbari; Farahnaz Sadoughi
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2015-04-19

6.  SARS in Singapore: surveillance strategies in a globalising city.

Authors:  Peggy Teo; Brenda S A Yeoh; Shir Nee Ong
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  The quality case for information technology in healthcare.

Authors:  David W Bates
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2002-10-23       Impact factor: 2.796

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.