Literature DB >> 11794440

The 1999 National Pressure Ulcer Prevalence Survey: a benchmarking approach.

S R Amlung1, W L Miller, L M Bosley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Health care professionals are faced with the ongoing challenge of improving performance. From physicians and nurses to process improvement experts, health care professionals are discovering new approaches to increasing the overall effectiveness of procedures used in clinical areas. One way to collect data useful for benchmarking specific clinical practices is through the use of prevalence studies.
DESIGN: A 1-day pressure ulcer prevalence survey was performed in March 1999. Acute care facilities across the United States volunteered to participate in the data collection process. Patients' demographic information, pressure ulcer stages, locations, and support surfaces were noted.
SETTING: 356 acute care facilities. PARTICIPANTS: 42,817 patients.
RESULTS: The overall pressure ulcer prevalence was 14.8%, with a nosocomial pressure ulcer prevalence of 7.1%.
CONCLUSIONS: Benchmarking is one of the tools that enables health care professionals to measure and identify inconsistencies in patient care practices. Understanding these inconsistencies enables the health care team to develop processes that are innovative and efficient. National pressure ulcer prevalence surveys provide a benchmark to evaluate an individual facility's care and treatment of patients at risk for pressure ulcer development. Success, however, lies in the health care professional's ability to take the information and apply it to clinical practice. Through the use of a benchmarking approach, performance gaps can be identified, processes can be put into place, and improved patient outcomes can be monitored and maintained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11794440     DOI: 10.1097/00129334-200111000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care        ISSN: 1527-7941            Impact factor:   2.347


  14 in total

Review 1.  Prediction and monitoring the therapeutic response of chronic dermal wounds.

Authors:  Keith Moore; Roisin McCallion; Richard J Searle; Michael C Stacey; Keith G Harding
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Phantom testing of the sensitivity and precision of a sub-epidermal moisture scanner.

Authors:  Lea Peko Cohen; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  High cost of stage IV pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Harold Brem; Jason Maggi; David Nierman; Linda Rolnitzky; David Bell; Robert Rennert; Michael Golinko; Alan Yan; Courtney Lyder; Bruce Vladeck
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  The relationship of pressure ulcers, race, and socioeconomic conditions after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Lee L Saunders; James S Krause; Bridget A Peters; Karla S Reed
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  Subepidermal moisture is associated with early pressure ulcer damage in nursing home residents with dark skin tones: pilot findings.

Authors:  Barbara M Bates-Jensen; Heather E McCreath; Voranan Pongquan
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.741

6.  Six-month mortality risks in long-term care residents with chronic ulcers.

Authors:  Paul Y Takahashi; Stephen S Cha; Lester J Kiemele
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.315

7.  Subepidermal moisture predicts erythema and stage 1 pressure ulcers in nursing home residents: a pilot study.

Authors:  Barbara M Bates-Jensen; Heather E McCreath; Ayumi Kono; Neil Christopher R Apeles; Cathy Alessi
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 8.  The role of vascular endothelial growth factor in wound healing.

Authors:  Philip Bao; Arber Kodra; Marjana Tomic-Canic; Michael S Golinko; H Paul Ehrlich; Harold Brem
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 2.192

9.  Treatment of pressure ulcers with larvae of Lucilia sericata.

Authors:  Erdal Polat; Zekayi Kutlubay; Serhat Sirekbasan; Hilal Gökalp; Ülkü Akarırmak
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-11-27

10.  Veterans' fall risk profile: a prevalence study.

Authors:  Patricia A Quigley; Polly Palacios; Andrea M Spehar
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.