Literature DB >> 11794263

Trochanteric fractures treated with a proximal femoral nail.

L J Domingo1, D Cecilia, A Herrera, C Resines.   

Abstract

We followed prospectively 295 patients with trochanteric fractures treated with the proximal femoral nail. The average age of the patients was 80 years and three out of four were female. The most frequent fracture type was A2 (59%). Clinical and radiographic controls were performed at 1, 3 and 6 months. There were technical complications during the operation in 12% of the cases, complications in the immediate postoperative period in 27% and late complications were detected in 4% of patients. Previous walking ability was recovered by 71%. The surgical technique is not complex, the number of complications recorded was acceptable and the overall results obtained are comparable with other fracture systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11794263      PMCID: PMC3620810          DOI: 10.1007/s002640100275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  24 in total

1.  Comparison of functional recovery in the very early period after surgery between plate and nail fixation for correction of stable femoral intertrochanteric fractures: a controlled clinical trial of 18 patients.

Authors:  Koun Yamauchi; Kazunari Fushimi; Goshi Shirai; Masashi Fukuta
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2014-06

2.  Treatment of reverse oblique trochanteric femoral fractures with proximal femoral nail.

Authors:  Korhan Ozkan; Engin Eceviz; Koray Unay; Levent Tasyikan; Budak Akman; Abdullah Eren
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-03-28       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Proximal femoral nails compared with reverse distal femoral locking plates in intertrochanteric fractures with a compromised lateral wall; a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Rehan Ul Haq; Vikrant Manhas; Amite Pankaj; Amit Srivastava; Ish Kumar Dhammi; Anil Kumar Jain
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-03-22       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Intrapelvic migration of hip lag screw of proximal femoral nail-sequele to a paradoxical reverse Z effect and their critical analysis.

Authors:  Hitesh Lal; Deepak Kumar Sharma; Deepak Mittal
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2012-06-16

5.  Prevention of inaccurate targeting of proximal screws during reconstruction femoral nailing.

Authors:  Ji Wan Kim; Derly O Cuellar; Jiandong Hao; Benoit Herbert; Cyril Mauffrey
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-04-05

6.  Proximal femoral nail - an analysis of 100 cases of proximal femoral fractures with an average follow up of 1 year.

Authors:  W M Gadegone; Y S Salphale
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Evaluation of complications of three different types of proximal extra-articular femur fractures: differences in complications, age, sex and surviving rates.

Authors:  Andreas A Suckel; Klaus Dietz; Nikolaus Wuelker; Peter Helwig
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Dynamic hip screw in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures: a comparison of two fixation methods.

Authors:  Yih-Shiunn Lee; Hui-Ling Huang; Ting-Ying Lo; Chien-Rae Huang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  [Treatment results and complications after PFN osteosynthesis].

Authors:  B Hohendorff; P Meyer; D Menezes; L Meier; R Elke
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Pitfalls and complications in the use of the proximal femoral nail.

Authors:  Joachim Windolf; Dirk A Hollander; Mohssen Hakimi; Wolfgang Linhart
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.