INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to investigate the time interval from the operation to no feeling of illness at all in a population of women, who had undergone a total abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data on 361 women who had had a total abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy during the period, 1.1.1998 to 31.3.1999 were collected from a regional database. Those born before 1.1.1940, presented with a genital malignancy, had a diagnosis of genital prolapse, or received surgery in addition to the hysterectomy were excluded. Four months after the hysterectomy, all the women were sent a questionnaire asking about the time of returning to work and the complete absence of any feeling of illness. This information was related to selected perioperative data. Women who had had a total abdominal hysterectomy were not statistically comparable with those who had had a vaginal hysterectomy. RESULTS: A total of 313 women participated (87%). After a total abdominal hysterectomy, 92%, 80%, and 35% had a subjective feeling of illness at four, six, and ten weeks, respectively. The median duration of feeling ill was nine weeks. The figures after a vaginal hysterectomy were 85%, 71%, and 18%, with a median duration of feeling ill of seven weeks. Only peroperative blood loss and the presence of postoperative complications related statistically to the duration of feeling ill. CONCLUSION: The interval between the operation and no feeling of illness at all after a total abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy is longer than was formerly believed. Further investigation is recommended.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to investigate the time interval from the operation to no feeling of illness at all in a population of women, who had undergone a total abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data on 361 women who had had a total abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy during the period, 1.1.1998 to 31.3.1999 were collected from a regional database. Those born before 1.1.1940, presented with a genital malignancy, had a diagnosis of genital prolapse, or received surgery in addition to the hysterectomy were excluded. Four months after the hysterectomy, all the women were sent a questionnaire asking about the time of returning to work and the complete absence of any feeling of illness. This information was related to selected perioperative data. Women who had had a total abdominal hysterectomy were not statistically comparable with those who had had a vaginal hysterectomy. RESULTS: A total of 313 women participated (87%). After a total abdominal hysterectomy, 92%, 80%, and 35% had a subjective feeling of illness at four, six, and ten weeks, respectively. The median duration of feeling ill was nine weeks. The figures after a vaginal hysterectomy were 85%, 71%, and 18%, with a median duration of feeling ill of seven weeks. Only peroperative blood loss and the presence of postoperative complications related statistically to the duration of feeling ill. CONCLUSION: The interval between the operation and no feeling of illness at all after a total abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy is longer than was formerly believed. Further investigation is recommended.
Authors: Antonie Vonk Noordegraaf; Judith A F Huirne; Hans A M Brölmann; Mark H Emanuel; Paul J M van Kesteren; Gunilla Kleiverda; Jos P Lips; Alexander Mozes; Andreas L Thurkow; Willem van Mechelen; Johannes R Anema Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Suzanne J Dedden; Esther V A Bouwsma; Peggy M A J Geomini; Marlies Y Bongers; Judith A F Huirne Journal: BMC Surg Date: 2022-03-04 Impact factor: 2.102
Authors: Esther Va Bouwsma; Johannes R Anema; Antonie Vonk Noordegraaf; Dirk L Knol; Judith E Bosmans; Steven E Schraffordt Koops; Paul Jm van Kesteren; W Marchien van Baal; Jos P Lips; Mark H Emanuel; Petrus C Scholten; Alexander Mozes; Albert H Adriaanse; Hans Am Brölmann; Judith Af Huirne Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2014-06-18
Authors: Esther V A Bouwsma; Judith A F Huirne; Peter M van de Ven; Antonie Vonk Noordegraaf; Frederieke G Schaafsma; Steven E Schraffordt Koops; Paul J M van Kesteren; Hans A M Brölmann; Johannes R Anema Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-01-30 Impact factor: 2.692