Literature DB >> 11793891

The Rorschach: facts, fictions, and future.

D J Viglione1, M J Hilsenroth.   

Abstract

A large body of empirical evidence supports the reliability, validity, and utility of the Rorschach. This same evidence reveals that the recent criticisms of the Rorschach are largely without merit. This article systematically addresses several significant Rorschach components: interrater and temporal consistency reliability, normative data and diversity, methodological issues, specific applications in the evaluation of thought disorder and suicide, meta-analyses, incremental validity, clinician judgment, patterns of use, and clinical utility. Strengths and weaknesses of the test are addressed, and research recommendations are made. This information should give the reader both an appreciation for the substantial, but often overlooked, research basis for the Rorschach and an appreciation of the challenges that lie ahead.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11793891

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Assess        ISSN: 1040-3590


  3 in total

1.  The Comparison of Iranian Normative Reference Data with Five Countries ‎Across Variables in Eight Rorschach Comprehensive System (CS) Clusters.

Authors:  Abufazel Hosseininasab; Mohammadreza Mohammadi; Samira Jouzi; Maryam Esmaeilinasab; Ali Delavar
Journal:  Iran J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-07

2.  Can the Rorschach be Administered Remotely? A Review of Options and a Pilot Study Using a Newly Developed R-PAS App.

Authors:  Francesca Ales; Gregory J Meyer; Joni L Mihura; Andrea Corgiat Loia; Sara Pasqualini; Alessandro Zennaro; Luciano Giromini
Journal:  Psychol Inj Law       Date:  2022-03-16

3.  Rorschach Assessment in Suicide Survivors: Focus on Suicidal Ideation.

Authors:  Arianna Palmieri; Johann Roland Kleinbub; Stefania Mannarini; Sara Molinaro; Cristina Castriotta; Paolo Scocco
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2019-01-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.