Literature DB >> 11793222

Comparison of functional annotation schemes for genomes.

S C Rison1, T C Hodgman, J M Thornton.   

Abstract

In this paper we survey a number of functional classification schemes applicable to genomes. We present the concepts of depth, breadth and resolution as descriptors of the schemes' scope and architecture and compare selected classifications according to these criteria. We also generate a 'Combined Scheme' against which we map six classifications which we believe are representative of the range currently available. The mapping allows the generation of 'FuncWheels', which are graphical representations of hierarchical classification schemes. They are used to illustrate similarities and differences in functional space coverage. This survey highlights many issues related to the design and implementation of gene product functional classifications, which are discussed in the light of emerging 'second-generation' schemes.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11793222     DOI: 10.1007/s101420000005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics        ISSN: 1438-793X            Impact factor:   3.410


  17 in total

1.  Creating the gene ontology resource: design and implementation.

Authors: 
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Comparative temporal analyses of the Pinus sylvestris L. var. mongolica litv. apical bud proteome from dormancy to growth.

Authors:  Ying-Dong Bi; Zhi-Gang Wei; Zhuo Shen; Tian-Cong Lu; Yu-Xiang Cheng; Bai-Chen Wang; Chuan-Ping Yang
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 2.316

3.  Detailed analysis of function divergence in a large and diverse domain superfamily: toward a refined protocol of function classification.

Authors:  Benoit H Dessailly; Oliver C Redfern; Alison L Cuff; Christine A Orengo
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 5.006

4.  The FunCat, a functional annotation scheme for systematic classification of proteins from whole genomes.

Authors:  Andreas Ruepp; Alfred Zollner; Dieter Maier; Kaj Albermann; Jean Hani; Martin Mokrejs; Igor Tetko; Ulrich Güldener; Gertrud Mannhaupt; Martin Münsterkötter; H Werner Mewes
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Formal TCA cycle description based on elementary actions.

Authors:  Pierre Maziere; Nicolas Parisey; Marie Beurton-Aimar; Franck Molina
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.826

6.  Computing biological functions using BioPsi, a formal description of biological processes based on elementary bricks of actions.

Authors:  Sabine Pérès; Liza Felicori; Stéphanie Rialle; Elodie Jobard; Franck Molina
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Visual account of protein investment in cellular functions.

Authors:  Wolfram Liebermeister; Elad Noor; Avi Flamholz; Dan Davidi; Jörg Bernhardt; Ron Milo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Gene function classification using Bayesian models with hierarchy-based priors.

Authors:  Babak Shahbaba; Radford M Neal
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Renal proteome in mice with different susceptibilities to fluorosis.

Authors:  Juliane Guimarães Carvalho; Aline de Lima Leite; Camila Peres-Buzalaf; Fernanda Salvato; Carlos Alberto Labate; Eric T Everett; Gary Milton Whitford; Marília Afonso Rabelo Buzalaf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Transcriptional analysis of drought-induced genes in the roots of a tolerant genotype of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.).

Authors:  Gustavo Henrique Recchia; Danielle Gregorio Gomes Caldas; Ana Luiza Ahern Beraldo; Márcio José da Silva; Siu Mui Tsai
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.