Literature DB >> 11791815

Economic approaches to doctor/nurse skill mix: problems, pitfalls, and partial solutions.

David Kernick1, Anthony Scott.   

Abstract

Against a background of government calls for a radical change in the way the medical workforce is planned and trained, the concept of skill mix seeks to match clinical presentation to an intervention based on an appropriate level of skill and training. Health economics is not the only framework within which these changes can be analysed. However unless the economic issues are thought through clearly there is a danger that resources may be used inefficiently. The aims of this paper are to outline the economic issues in the area of doctor/nurse skill mix and the problems of obtaining correct solutions from the perspective of efficiency. It concludes by offering a pragmatic framework which can facilitate decisions in this area. Although this paper is written from the perspective of primary care, it is equally relevant to skill mix in the secondary care sector.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11791815      PMCID: PMC1314200     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  11 in total

1.  Costing interventions in primary care.

Authors:  D Kernick
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.267

2.  Costs are as important as outcomes.

Authors:  D P Kernick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-09-02

3.  A cost consequence study of the impact of a dermatology-trained practice nurse on the quality of life of primary care patients with eczema and psoriasis.

Authors:  D Kernick; A Cox; R Powell; D Reinhold; J Sawkins; A Warin
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  The role of cost-consequence analysis in healthcare decision-making.

Authors:  J A Mauskopf; J E Paul; D M Grant; A Stergachis
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  What does a GP consultation cost?

Authors:  B Graham; K McGregor
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Bringing nurses and doctors closer together.

Authors:  N Casey; R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-03-01

7.  The Burlington randomized trial of the nurse practitioner.

Authors:  W O Spitzer; D L Sackett; J C Sibley; R S Roberts; M Gent; D J Kergin; B C Hackett; A Olynich
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1974-01-31       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Marginal costs and benefits.

Authors:  D J Torgerson; A Spencer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-01-06

Review 9.  Evaluating the clinical nurse specialist. A review.

Authors:  J Wilson-Barnett; S Beech
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.837

10.  Comparing healthcare outcomes.

Authors:  C Orchard
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-06-04
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Comparing the cost of nurse practitioners and GPs in primary care: modelling economic data from randomised trials.

Authors:  Sandra Hollinghurst; Sue Horrocks; Elizabeth Anderson; Chris Salisbury
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Skill-mix change and the general practice workforce challenge.

Authors:  David Kernick
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Systematic review of whether nurse practitioners working in primary care can provide equivalent care to doctors.

Authors:  Sue Horrocks; Elizabeth Anderson; Chris Salisbury
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-06

4.  Impact of nurse practitioners on workload of general practitioners: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Miranda G H Laurant; Rosella P M G Hermens; Jozé C C Braspenning; Bonnie Sibbald; Richard P T M Grol
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-04-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.