Literature DB >> 11790909

Why clinicians often disagree about the validity of test results.

P Green1.   

Abstract

Examining the validity of test results using specialised methods is still a relatively new venture and many different approaches are taken to the same task. This paper discusses some of the reasons why discrepant results and differing conclusions may be arrived at by clinicians or researchers, depending on their theoretical and practical choices. These choices include whether to test for effort, what methods to use, how to employ effort tests, what failure criteria to apply and how to interpret individual results. Equally important is the decision about whether or not to employ effort testing to remove error from data in group research studies. No concensus has yet been reached on the need for systematic effort testing in group studies but there are indications that it should be a serious consideration because controlling for invalid data can lead to altered conclusions.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11790909

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation        ISSN: 1053-8135            Impact factor:   2.138


  1 in total

Review 1.  The Legacy of the TTASAAN Report-Premature Conclusions and Forgotten Promises: A Review of Policy and Practice Part I.

Authors:  Dan G Pavel; Theodore A Henderson; Simon DeBruin
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.086

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.