Literature DB >> 11790904

Limitations of neuropsychological testing to predict the cognitive and behavioral functioning of persons with brain injury in real-world settings.

R J Sbordone1.   

Abstract

While neuropsychological tests have been designed to identify cognitive impairments stemming from a brain insult and their severity, the vast majority of these tests were never designed to predict how these patients were likely to function in real-world settings, live independently, return to work, or maintain competitive employment. No one specific neuropsychological test or measure can accurately predict how an individual who has sustained a brain insult will function in everyday or vocational settings. Predictions based on neuropsychological test data tend to be more accurate if the particular tasks utilized during testing closely match or simulate the individual's everyday and vocational demands. Predicting an individual's vocational potential also requires a careful assessment of his or her work and medical history, injury characteristics, emotional and behavioral functioning, motivation to return to work, and family circumstances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11790904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation        ISSN: 1053-8135            Impact factor:   2.138


  9 in total

1.  Inter-professional clinical practice guideline for vocational evaluation following traumatic brain injury: a systematic and evidence-based approach.

Authors:  Mary Stergiou-Kita; Deirdre Dawson; Susan Rappolt
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-06

2.  Development and psychometric properties of the instrumental activities of daily living: compensation scale.

Authors:  Maureen Schmitter-Edgecombe; Carolyn Parsey; Richard Lamb
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 2.813

3.  Trail Making Test predicts physical impairment and mortality in older persons.

Authors:  Rosamaria Vazzana; Stefania Bandinelli; Fabrizio Lauretani; Stefano Volpato; Fulvio Lauretani; Angelo Di Iorio; Michele Abate; Anna Maria Corsi; Yuri Milaneschi; Jack M Guralnik; Luigi Ferrucci
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  From battlefield to home: a mobile platform for assessing brain health.

Authors:  Helaine E Resnick; Corinna E Lathan
Journal:  Mhealth       Date:  2016-07-22

Review 5.  An integrated review of the processes and factors relevant to vocational evaluation following traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Mary Stergiou-Kita; Deirdre R Dawson; Susan G Rappolt
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-09

Review 6.  Pathophysiology of cognitive dysfunction and the role of combined brain/heart magnetic resonance imaging (Review).

Authors:  George Markousis-Mavrogenis; Flora Bacopoulou; Genovefa Kolovou; Maria-Roser Pons; Aikaterini Giannakopoulou; Antigoni Papavasiliou; George D Kitas; George P Chrousos; Sophie I Mavrogeni
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 2.751

7.  Testing a Novel Web-Based Neurocognitive Battery in the General Community: Validation and Usability Study.

Authors:  Riley Capizzi; Melissa Fisher; Bruno Biagianti; Neelufaer Ghiasi; Ariel Currie; Karrie Fitzpatrick; Nicholas Albertini; Sophia Vinogradov
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Subjective cognitive complaints one year after ceasing adjuvant endocrine treatment for early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  K Ribi; J Aldridge; K-A Phillips; A Thompson; V Harvey; B Thürlimann; F Cardoso; O Pagani; A S Coates; A Goldhirsch; K N Price; R D Gelber; J Bernhard
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Development of a video-simulation instrument for assessing cognition in older adults.

Authors:  Edward H Ip; Ryan Barnard; Sarah A Marshall; Lingyi Lu; Kaycee Sink; Valerie Wilson; Dana Chamberlain; Stephen R Rapp
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.796

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.