Literature DB >> 11790520

Fluoxetine and sleep EEG: effects of a single dose, subchronic treatment, and discontinuation in healthy subjects.

Bernd Feige1, Ulrich Voderholzer, Dieter Riemann, Ralf Dittmann, Fritz Hohagen, Mathias Berger.   

Abstract

The goals of the current study were to evaluate whether a single dose of fluoxetine causes qualitatively different changes in sleep architecture and NREM sleep EEG than subchronic administration in healthy subjects and to determine degree and duration of such changes after the single dose and after discontinuation from subchronic administration. Our hypothesis was that subchronic intake should cause changes qualitatively different from the single dose and that such changes could be sufficiently long-lived to suggest the possibility of a dosing in intervals of several days. Ten healthy volunteers first took one single 60-mg dose of fluoxetine and a week later started to take a 40-mg dose every morning for three weeks. Sleep laboratory nights included two nights before and four nights after the single dose and every second night for two weeks after discontinuation from subchronic administration. The single dose caused only a slight increase in drug plasma concentrations but relatively clear changes in sleep structure. After discontinuation from subchronic administration, sleep quality indices normalized quickly (within 2-4 days), whereas REM latency and spectral power effects correlated with total SSRI plasma concentration and normalized more slowly, corresponding to the drug plasma half-life of about 10 days. The REM fraction of the sleep period showed a rebound, whereas the delta sleep ratio did not correlate with drug plasma levels and yet remained increased after the medication interval. Thus, the only qualitative difference seen between acute and subchronic medication was the initial sleep disturbance. REM latency and especially the delta sleep ratio remained increased for several days after discontinuation from subchronic administration, indicating the possibility of a less-than-daily maintenance medication after an initial daily interval. Finally, the pattern of change observed for the delta sleep ratio indicates that it may be due to secondary, adaptive effects possibly linked to the antidepressant effect of fluoxetine in depressed patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11790520     DOI: 10.1016/S0893-133X(01)00314-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology        ISSN: 0893-133X            Impact factor:   7.853


  13 in total

1.  Differential adaptation of REM sleep latency, intermediate stage and theta power effects of escitalopram after chronic treatment.

Authors:  Szilvia Vas; Zita Kátai; Diána Kostyalik; Dorottya Pap; Eszter Molnár; Péter Petschner; Lajos Kalmár; György Bagdy
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 3.575

2.  A sleepy patient with REM rebound.

Authors:  Steven D Brass; Sanford Auerbach
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 4.062

3.  Chronic escitalopram treatment caused dissociative adaptation in serotonin (5-HT) 2C receptor antagonist-induced effects in REM sleep, wake and theta wave activity.

Authors:  Diána Kostyalik; Zita Kátai; Szilvia Vas; Dorottya Pap; Péter Petschner; Eszter Molnár; István Gyertyán; Lajos Kalmár; László Tóthfalusi; Gyorgy Bagdy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Antidepressants and sleep: a qualitative review of the literature.

Authors:  Sue Wilson; Spilios Argyropoulos
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Modulating role of serotonergic signaling in sleep and memory.

Authors:  Salar Vaseghi; Shirin Arjmandi-Rad; Maliheh Eskandari; Mahshid Ebrahimnejad; Gita Kholghi; Mohammad-Reza Zarrindast
Journal:  Pharmacol Rep       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 3.024

6.  Eszopiclone treatment for insomnia: effect size comparisons in patients with primary insomnia and insomnia with medical and psychiatric comorbidity.

Authors:  Andrew D Krystal; W Vaughn McCall; Maurizio Fava; Hadine Joffe; Claudio N Soares; Holly Huang; Todd Grinell; Jacqueline Zummo; William Spalding; Randall Marshall
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2012-07-05

7.  Sleep disturbance as detected by actigraphy in pre-pubertal juvenile monkeys receiving therapeutic doses of fluoxetine.

Authors:  Mari S Golub; Casey E Hogrefe
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 3.763

8.  Online sentence processing impairments in agrammatic and logopenic primary progressive aphasia: Evidence from ERP.

Authors:  Elena Barbieri; Kaitlyn A Litcofsky; Matthew Walenski; Brianne Chiappetta; Marek-Marsel Mesulam; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Fluoxetine exerts age-dependent effects on behavior and amygdala neuroplasticity in the rat.

Authors:  Judith R Homberg; Jocelien D A Olivier; Tom Blom; Tim Arentsen; Chantal van Brunschot; Pieter Schipper; Gerdien Korte-Bouws; Gilles van Luijtelaar; Liesbeth Reneman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Differentiated effects of the multimodal antidepressant vortioxetine on sleep architecture: Part 1, a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic comparison with paroxetine in healthy men.

Authors:  Sue Wilson; Astrid-Maria Højer; Jeppe Buchberg; Johan Areberg; David J Nutt
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 4.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.