Literature DB >> 11790060

Diagnosis of lower-limb deep venous thrombosis: a prospective blinded study of magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging.

Douglas G W Fraser1, Alan R Moody, Paul S Morgan, Anne L Martel, Ian Davidson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current magnetic resonance techniques generate high signal from venous blood and show thrombi as filling defects. Magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging (MRDTI) directly visualizes acute thrombus.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of MRDTI for diagnosis of acute symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT) below and above the knee.
DESIGN: Prospective, blinded study.
SETTING: A 1355-bed university hospital. PATIENTS: 101 patients with suspected DVT who had had routine venography. Participants were recruited from a cohort of patients with suspected DVT. All patients with a positive venogram and one quarter of patients with a negative venogram were selected by using a random sequence. INTERVENTION: MRDTI was performed within 48 hours of venography and was interpreted by two reviewers. MEASUREMENTS: Diagnosis of DVT overall; isolated calf, femoropopliteal, and ileofemoral DVT; and thrombus in the calf, femoropopliteal, and iliac segments.
RESULTS: The reports from two readers had sensitivities of 96% and 94% and specificities of 90% and 92% for diagnosis of DVT. Sensitivities were 92% and 83% for isolated calf DVT, 97% and 97% for femoropopliteal DVT, and 100% and 100% for ileofemoral DVT. Specificities were 94% and 96% for isolated calf DVT and 100% and 100% for both femoropopliteal and ileofemoral DVT. Similarly, sensitivity and specificity within each of the venous segments ranged from 91% to 100%. Interobserver variability measured by using a weighted kappa statistic ranged from 0.89 to 0.98 for these measures.
CONCLUSION: Magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging is an accurate noninvasive test for diagnosis of DVT, and its accuracy is maintained below the knee. Comparison of individual venous segments showed that results of MRDTI agreed strongly with findings on venography. Scanning was well tolerated, and interpretation was highly reproducible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11790060     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-2-200201150-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  42 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis, investigation, and management of deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Clive Tovey; Suzanne Wyatt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-05-31

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of coronary atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Zahi A Fayad; Robin P Choudhury; Valentin Fuster
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.113

3.  Diagnosis of DVT: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Shannon M Bates; Roman Jaeschke; Scott M Stevens; Steven Goodacre; Philip S Wells; Matthew D Stevenson; Clive Kearon; Holger J Schunemann; Mark Crowther; Stephen G Pauker; Regina Makdissi; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 6.  MR imaging of the pulmonary vasculature--an update.

Authors:  Mark R Pedersen; Mark T Fisher; Edwin J R van Beek
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  The accuracy of MRI in diagnosis of suspected deep vein thrombosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fiona C Sampson; Steve W Goodacre; Steven M Thomas; Edwin J R van Beek
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  3D T(1)-mapping for the characterization of deep vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Ulrike Blume; James Orbell; Matthew Waltham; Alberto Smith; Reza Razavi; Tobias Schaeffter
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 9.  Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Clive Kearon
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Accurate diagnosis of iliac vein thrombosis in pregnancy with magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging (MRDTI).

Authors:  Charlotte E A Dronkers; Alexandr Srámek; Menno V Huisman; Frederikus A Klok
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2016-12-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.