Literature DB >> 11787240

Taking the national guideline for care of acute myocardial infarction to the bedside: developing the guideline applied in practice (GAP) initiative in Southeast Michigan.

Kim A Eagle1, Meg Gallogly, Rajendra H Mehta, Patricia L Baker, Angela Blount, Marge Freundl, Michele J Orza, Robert Parrish, Arthur L Riba, Cecelia Kucyk Montoye.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Guideline Applied in Practice (GAP) program was developed in 2000 to improve the quality of care by improving adherence to clinical practice guidelines. For the first GAP project, the American College of Cardiology (ACC) partnered with the Southeast Michigan Quality Forum Cardiovascular Subgroup and the Michigan Peer Review Organization (MPRO) to develop interventions that might facilitate the use of the ACC/AHA Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) guideline in the practice setting. Ten Michigan hospitals participated in implementing the project, which began in March 2000. DESIGNING THE PROJECT: The project developed a multifaceted intervention aimed at key players in the care delivery triangle: the physician, nurse, and patient. Intervention components included a project kick-off presentation and dinner, creation and implementation of a customized tool kit, identification and assignment of local nurse and physician opinion leaders, grand rounds site visits, and measurement before and after the intervention. IMPLEMENTING THE PROJECT: The GAP project experience suggests that hospitals are enthusiastic about partnering with ACC to improve quality of care; partners can work together to develop a program for guideline implementation; rapid-cycle implementation is possible with the GAP model; guidelines and quality indicators for AMI are well accepted; and hospitals can adapt the national guideline for care into usable tools focused on physicians, nurses, and patients. DISCUSSION: Important structure and process changes--both of which are required for successful QI efforts--have been demonstrated in this project. Ultimately, the failure or success of this initiative will depend on an indication that the demonstrated improvement in the quality indicators is sustained over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11787240     DOI: 10.1016/s1070-3241(02)28002-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv        ISSN: 1070-3241


  4 in total

1.  Multimethod evaluation of the VA's peer-to-peer Toolkit for patient-centered medical home implementation.

Authors:  Jeff Luck; Candice Bowman; Laura York; Amanda Midboe; Thomas Taylor; Randall Gale; Steven Asch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Informatics, evidence-based care, and research; implications for national policy: a report of an American Medical Informatics Association health policy conference.

Authors:  Meryl Bloomrosen; Don E Detmer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Changes in practice patterns affecting in-hospital and post-discharge survival among ACS patients.

Authors:  Manfred Stommel; Ade Olomu; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; William Corser; Joseph C Gardiner
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Implementing shared decision making in federally qualified health centers, a quasi-experimental design study: the Office-Guidelines Applied to Practice (Office-GAP) program.

Authors:  Adesuwa Olomu; William Hart-Davidson; Zhehui Luo; Karen Kelly-Blake; Margaret Holmes-Rovner
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 2.655

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.