Literature DB >> 11785056

[On the function of dendritic filopodia].

C Portera Cailliau1, R Yuste.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Dendritic spines were first described by Ramón y Cajal in 1888, and considered by him to be the major sites of axo dendritic apposition and therefore of synaptic input in the CNS. Although a considerable wealth of information has been gathered over the last few decades about the function of spines in the mature nervous system, much less is known about how spines first appear on the otherwise smooth dendritic shafts. DEVELOPMENT: The earliest dendritic appendages, known as filopodia, are long and thin protrusions that occur predominantly during early postnatal development of the mammalian CNS. It is tempting to consider filopodia simply as precursors to spines because at first glance their overall shape is similar to that of mature spines and because their expression during development precedes that of spines. However, the elongated shape of dendritic filopodia (reminiscent of that of axonal filopodia and filopodia in non-neuronal cells) suggests an exploratory function, so that their role may be to contact axons in order to establish early synapses, independently of the eventual formation of spines.
CONCLUSIONS: Here we review the literature on dendritic filopodia in an attempt to resolve this issue regarding these two distinct (though potentially overlapping) roles of filopodia in development: spinogenesis vs synaptogenesis. We summarize what is known about the physical characteristics and developmental time course of filopodia expression, as well as the mechanisms of growth and motility of these early dendritic protrusions, both in the intact nervous system and in pathologic settings. Throughout this review we present evidence that supports two hypotheses: that filopodia and spines are two inherently different types of protrusions, and that the role of dendritic filopodia is to capture axons and make early synapses, rather than transform into spines. Finally, we also discuss the potential role of filopodia in the sculpting of the dendritic tree. We also postulate that filopodia have additional important roles in regeneration and repair, in developmental plasticity and in the elaboration of dendritic arbors. These functions may not be limited to a specific developmental period, but probably extend into adulthood. We end by discussing specific experiments that could serve to test these hypotheses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11785056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Neurol        ISSN: 0210-0010            Impact factor:   0.870


  8 in total

1.  Delayed stabilization of dendritic spines in fragile X mice.

Authors:  Alberto Cruz-Martín; Michelle Crespo; Carlos Portera-Cailliau
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  The trouble with spines in fragile X syndrome: density, maturity and plasticity.

Authors:  C X He; C Portera-Cailliau
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 3.  Excitatory amino acid involvement in dendritic spine formation, maintenance and remodelling.

Authors:  R Anne McKinney
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Proteins that promote filopodia stability, but not number, lead to more axonal-dendritic contacts.

Authors:  Pamela Arstikaitis; Catherine Gauthier-Campbell; Kun Huang; Alaa El-Husseini; Timothy H Murphy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Glutamate induces the elongation of early dendritic protrusions via mGluRs in wild type mice, but not in fragile X mice.

Authors:  Alberto Cruz-Martín; Michelle Crespo; Carlos Portera-Cailliau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Sleep promotes the formation of dendritic filopodia and spines near learning-inactive existing spines.

Authors:  Avital Adler; Cora Sau Wan Lai; Guang Yang; Erez Geron; Yang Bai; Wen-Biao Gan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 12.779

7.  Cell Type-Specific mRNA Dysregulation in Hippocampal CA1 Pyramidal Neurons of the Fragile X Syndrome Mouse Model.

Authors:  Laura Ceolin; Nathalie Bouquier; Jihane Vitre-Boubaker; Stéphanie Rialle; Dany Severac; Emmanuel Valjent; Julie Perroy; Emma Puighermanal
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 5.639

8.  ICAM5 as a Novel Target for Treating Cognitive Impairment in Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Ya-Ping Pei; Yue-Yi Wang; Dan Liu; Hui-Yang Lei; Zhi-Hao Yang; Zi-Wei Zhang; Man Han; Ke Cheng; Yu-Shan Chen; Jin-Quan Li; Gui-Rong Cheng; Lang Xu; Qing-Ming Wu; Shawn M McClintock; Ying Yang; Yong Zhang; Yan Zeng
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 6.167

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.