Literature DB >> 11784751

Human gaze stabilization during active head translations.

W P Medendorp1, J A M Van Gisbergen, C C A M Gielen.   

Abstract

This study investigated how binocular gaze is controlled to compensate for self-generated translational movements of the head where geometric requirements dictate that the ideal gaze signal needs to be modulated by the inverse of target distance. Binocular gaze (eye plus head) was measured for visual and remembered targets at various distances in six human subjects during active head translations at frequencies of 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 Hz. We found that, during head translations, gaze changes were achieved by a combination of eye and head rotations. Accordingly, stabilization performance was characterized by the gaze response parameters sensitivity and phase, where sensitivity is defined as the ratio of gaze velocity and translational eye velocity and where phase refers to the phase delay of gaze velocity relative to translational eye velocity. In the analysis, we used a binocular coordinate system yielding a version and a vergence component. We examined how frequency and target distance, estimated from the vergence angle, affected sensitivity and phase of the version component of the gaze signal and compared the results to the requirements for ideal performance. The relation between gaze sensitivity and the inverse of distance was characterized by a linear regression analysis. The ratio of the slope of the linear regression and the slope required for ideal stabilization provided a measure for the degree of "distance compensation." The results show that distance compensation was better for a visual target than for remembered targets in darkness, and behaved according to low-pass characteristics in both target conditions. It declined from 1.00 to 0.84 for visual targets and from 0.87 to 0.57 for remembered targets in the frequency range 0.25-1.5 Hz. The intercept obtained from the regression yielded the gaze response at zero vergence and specified a "default sensitivity" of gaze compensation. Default sensitivity increased with frequency from 0.02 at 0.25 Hz to 0.10 degrees/cm at 1.5 Hz for visual targets and from 0.04 to 0.16 degrees/cm in darkness. The phase delays of the gaze response increased on average from 2 to 7 degrees in the frequency range 0.25-1.5 Hz. In comparison with earlier passive studies, active translation compensation in the dark is superior at all frequencies where comparison was possible. We conclude that a nonvestibular signal with low-pass characteristics contributes to gaze during active head translations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11784751     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00892.2000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  8 in total

1.  Retinal slip during active head motion and stimulus motion.

Authors:  C C A M Gielen; S F Gabel; J Duysens
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Motion parallax is computed in the updating of human spatial memory.

Authors:  W Pieter Medendorp; Douglas B Tweed; J Douglas Crawford
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-09-03       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Do visual cues contribute to the neural estimate of viewing distance used by the oculomotor system?

Authors:  Min Wei; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Active linear head motion improves dynamic visual acuity in pursuing a high-speed moving object.

Authors:  Tatsuhisa Hasegawa; Masayuki Yamashita; Toshihiro Suzuki; Yasuo Hisa; Yoshiro Wada
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The visual input to the retina during natural head-free fixation.

Authors:  Murat Aytekin; Jonathan D Victor; Michele Rucci
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Rapid adaptation of torso pointing movements to perturbations of the base of support.

Authors:  Todd E Hudson; James R Lackner; Paul DiZio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  A comparison of geometric- and regression-based mobile gaze-tracking.

Authors:  Björn Browatzki; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Lewis L Chuang
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Eye Movements in Darkness Modulate Self-Motion Perception.

Authors:  Ivar Adrianus H Clemens; Luc P J Selen; Antonella Pomante; Paul R MacNeilage; W Pieter Medendorp
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2017-01-25
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.