Literature DB >> 11783920

Outcome study of hallux valgus surgery--an AOFAS multi-center study.

D B Thordarson1, S A Rudicel, E Ebramzadeh, L H Gill.   

Abstract

Three hundred and eleven patients have been enrolled in a multi-center prospective study evaluating the outcome of hallux valgus surgery by the members of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society. One hundred seventy-nine of these patients have completed six-month follow-up questionnaires, and 195 have completed 12-month questionnaires. The AAOS Lower Limb Outcomes Data Collection Questionnaire and the Foot and Ankle Outcomes Data Collection Questionnaire were used to assess patients' perceptions of their results. Both of these instruments are validated lower extremity instruments. They contain the SF-36 instrument as well as questions relating to lower extremity function. At six- and 12-month follow-up, significant improvement has been noted in the patients' SF-36 physical function scores, role physical scores, and bodily pain scores. Role emotional scores were increased at six months but returned to baseline at 12 months. The scores for physical health and pain and satisfaction with symptoms for the lower extremity have significantly improved. The global foot and ankle score and shoe comfort score from the foot and ankle module have also significantly improved. This outcome study is the first to focus on the patient's perception of results of hallux valgus surgery and demonstrates a significant improvement in pain, function, and satisfaction after bunion surgery performed by members of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11783920     DOI: 10.1177/107110070102201205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  5 in total

1.  Development and reliability of a standard rating system for outcome measurement of foot and ankle disorders II: interclinician and intraclinician reliability and validity of the newly established standard rating scales and Japanese Orthopaedic Association rating scale.

Authors:  Hisateru Niki; Haruhito Aoki; Suguru Inokuchi; Satoru Ozeki; Mitsuo Kinoshita; Hideji Kura; Yasuhito Tanaka; Masahiko Noguchi; Shigeharu Nomura; Masahito Hatori; Shinobu Tatsunami
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.601

2.  Development and reliability of a standard rating system for outcome measurement of foot and ankle disorders I: development of standard rating system.

Authors:  Hisateru Niki; Haruhito Aoki; Suguru Inokuchi; Satoru Ozeki; Mitsuo Kinoshita; Hideji Kura; Yasuhito Tanaka; Masahiko Noguchi; Shigeharu Nomura; Masahito Hatori; Shinobu Tatsunami
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.601

3.  Quality-of-life outcome after hallux valgus surgery.

Authors:  Carlos Saro; Irene Jensen; Urban Lindgren; Li Felländer-Tsai
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 3.440

4.  Endolog technique for correction of hallux valgus: a prospective study of 30 patients with 4-year follow-up.

Authors:  Carlo Biz; Marco Corradin; Ilaria Petretta; Roberto Aldegheri
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN QUALITY OF LIFE AND RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS AFTER HALLUX VALGUS CORRECTION.

Authors:  Henrique Mansur; Vinicius Cardoso; Thomas Nogueira; Isnar Castro
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.513

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.