Literature DB >> 11781970

A comparison of 3 alloy surface treatments for resin-bonded prostheses.

C S Petrie1, J D Eick, K Williams, P Spencer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The most frequent cause of clinical failure of resin-bonded fixed partial dentures is a debonding at the metal-cement interface. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the tensile bond strengths of 3 different alloy-surface treatments when cemented to human enamel with a resin cement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cylinders of a nickel-chromium-beryllium (Ni-Cr-Be) and a gold-palladium (Au-Pd) alloy were fabricated and assigned to different surface treatment groups as follows: Group 1: Ni-Cr-Be, chemically etched; Group 2: Au-Pd, airborne particle-abraded and tin-plated; and Group 3: Au-Pd, airborne particle-abraded and treated with the Alloy Primer (Kuraray Co, LTD, Osaka, Japan). The cylinders were bonded to the enamel surfaces of extracted, human third molars and stored in normal saline at 37 degrees C for 48 hours. The tensile bond strength of 21 specimens from each group was measured on a Universal Testing Machine (Instron, Canton, MA). Three failed specimens of each group were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive spectroscopy.
RESULTS: Statistically significant differences (p <.05) were found between all 3 treatment groups. The mean tensile bond strengths (+/- the standard error of mean) recorded as follows: Group 1: 10.6 MPa (+/-1.3), Group 2: 0.9 MPa (+/-0.2), and Group 3: 13.4 MPa (+/-1.0). Specimens from groups 1 and 3 revealed a trend towards mixture of cohesive, within the resin cement, and adhesive failures at the metal-cement interface. Group 2 specimens exhibited primarily adhesive failures at the metal-cement interface.
CONCLUSIONS: The tensile bond strength of Au-Pd alloy specimens was significantly increased with the Alloy Primer. Copyright 2001 by The American College of Prosthodontists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11781970     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849x.2001.00217.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthodont        ISSN: 1059-941X            Impact factor:   2.752


  5 in total

Review 1.  Practical clinical considerations of luting cements: A review.

Authors:  Pritam P Lad; Maya Kamath; Kavita Tarale; Preethi B Kusugal
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2014-02-26

2.  Effects of Different Surface Treatments on Bond Strength of Resin Cement to Machined Pure Titanium.

Authors:  Yang Cao; Yan-Yang Guo; Lei Chen; Jing Han; Hui Tong; Bao Zhang; Yu Zhang
Journal:  J Adhes Dent       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.359

3.  Shear Bond Strength of a Resin Cement to Different Alloys Subjected to Various Surface Treatments.

Authors:  Fariba Ezoji; Kasra Tabari; Zahra Jaberi Ansari; Hassan Torabzadeh; Mohammad Javad Kharrazi Fard
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2016-01

4.  An Enamel Based Biopolymer Prosthesis for Dental Treatment with the Proper Bond Strength and Hardness and Biosafety.

Authors:  Morakot Piemjai; Patcharee Santiwarapan
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.329

5.  Effect of metal type and surface treatment on shear bond strength of resin cement (in vitro study).

Authors:  Hiba Al-Helou; Eyad Swed
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.