Literature DB >> 11781944

T-wave morphology differences between patients with and without arrhythmic complication of ischemic heart disease.

K Hnatkova1, S J Ryan, J Bathen, B Acar, V Batchvarov, H H Hoium, M Malik.   

Abstract

The study investigated the differences in T-wave morphology between normal controls, patients with an uncomplicated follow-up after a myocardial infarction (MI), and patients with ischaemic heart disease and a history of ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF). The study population consisted of 164 healthy patients (age 53.4 +/- 18.7 years old, 80 women), 123 VT/VF patients (age 63.8 +/- 10.1 years old, 15 women), and 196 MI patients (age 59.2 +/- 10.0 years old, 23 women). In all patients, supine resting signal-averaged orthogonal electrocardiograms were obtained. After singular value decomposition of electrocardiogram signal, 2 T-wave morphology descriptors were calculated: total cosine R to T describing the global angle between repolarisation and depolarisation loops, and percentage of loop area expressing the irregularity of the T-wave loop (a more irregular wave results in a lower percentage of loop area value). Both parameters were practically uncorrelated (Controls: r = - .106, MI r = .161, and VT/VF r = .173) and different between individual groups of patients: total cosine R to T (Control vs. MI: P = 4.3 x 10(-8), Control vs. VT/VF: P = 2.7 x 10(-16), MI vs. VT/VF: P = 3.1 x 10(-6)), percentage of loop area (Control vs. MI: P = 0.07, Control vs. VT/VF: P = 1.1 x 10(-8), MI vs. VT/VF: P = 2.9 x 10(-5), all nonparametric Mann-Whitney test). The comparisons of cumulative histograms also revealed significant differences between all three groups for both parameters (Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA test). Thus, these numerical descriptors of T-wave morphology are powerful indicators of arrhythmic complications among patients with ischaemic heart disease. They also differentiate between patients with stable uncomplicated ischaemic heart disease and healthy controls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11781944     DOI: 10.1054/jelc.2001.28836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electrocardiol        ISSN: 0022-0736            Impact factor:   1.438


  5 in total

1.  Response to Letter to the Editor: Deep waters of science.

Authors:  Gary Tse; Adrian Baranchuk
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 2.  Evaluation of drug-induced QT interval prolongation: implications for drug approval and labelling.

Authors:  M Malik; A J Camm
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Total cosine R-to-T for predicting ventricular arrhythmic and mortality outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gary Tse; Mengqi Gong; Cheuk Wai Wong; Cynthia Chan; Stamatis Georgopoulos; Yat Sun Chan; Bryan P Yan; Guangping Li; Paula Whittaker; Ana Ciobanu; Sadeq Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh; Sunny H Wong; William K K Wu; George Bazoukis; Konstantinos Lampropoulos; Wing Tak Wong; Lap Ah Tse; Adrian M Baranchuk; Konstantinos P Letsas; Tong Liu
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Shallow meta analysis.

Authors:  Marek Malik
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 1.468

5.  T-wave loop area from a pre-implant 12-lead ECG is associated with appropriate ICD shocks.

Authors:  Joachim Seegers; Katerina Hnatkova; Tim Friede; Marek Malik; Markus Zabel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.