L R Galvin1, H P Godfrey. 1. Psychology Department, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This article reviews literature examining the psychological adjustment to Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) and illustrates the applicability of a Stress Appraisal and Coping model (SAC) for rehabilitation of this population. METHOD: Articles concerning psychological adjustment to SCI from the previous three decades have been reviewed and critiqued. When possible the articles have been discussed in a SAC framework. RESULTS: The literature indicates that psychological adjustment to SCI is largely predictable from psychological variables including coping, appraisal and psychosocial resources. Recent literature has suggested psychological intervention can promote positive psychological adjustment following SCI for those individuals at risk of developing clinical levels of depression. CONCLUSION: The SAC model provides a comprehensive formulation to incorporate the heterogeneity of populations with SCI. Suggestions for future research include developing assessment and treatment regimes specifically tailored to the strengths and weaknesses of an individual as highlighted in the model.
OBJECTIVES: This article reviews literature examining the psychological adjustment to Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) and illustrates the applicability of a Stress Appraisal and Coping model (SAC) for rehabilitation of this population. METHOD: Articles concerning psychological adjustment to SCI from the previous three decades have been reviewed and critiqued. When possible the articles have been discussed in a SAC framework. RESULTS: The literature indicates that psychological adjustment to SCI is largely predictable from psychological variables including coping, appraisal and psychosocial resources. Recent literature has suggested psychological intervention can promote positive psychological adjustment following SCI for those individuals at risk of developing clinical levels of depression. CONCLUSION: The SAC model provides a comprehensive formulation to incorporate the heterogeneity of populations with SCI. Suggestions for future research include developing assessment and treatment regimes specifically tailored to the strengths and weaknesses of an individual as highlighted in the model.
Authors: Abdullah S Alhurani; Rebecca Dekker; Muayyad Ahmad; Jennifer Miller; Khalil M Yousef; Basel Abdulqader; Ibrahim Salami; Terry A Lennie; David C Randall; Debra K Moser Journal: Heart Lung Date: 2018-04-04 Impact factor: 2.210
Authors: Claudio Peter; Rachel Müller; Alarcos Cieza; Marcel W M Post; Christel M C van Leeuwen; Christina S Werner; Szilvia Geyh Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2014-06-01 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: E Littooij; C J W Leget; J M Stolwijk-Swüste; S Doodeman; G A M Widdershoven; J Dekker Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2016-04-19 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: Swati Mehta; Steven Orenczuk; Kevin T Hansen; Jo-Anne L Aubut; Sander L Hitzig; Matthew Legassic; Robert W Teasell Journal: Rehabil Psychol Date: 2011-02
Authors: Scott D McDonald; Melody N Mickens; Lisa D Goldberg-Looney; Brian J Mutchler; Michael S Ellwood; Teodoro A Castillo Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2017-03-13 Impact factor: 1.985