Literature DB >> 11781625

Improved clinical outcome of paediatric bone marrow recipients using a test dose and Bayesian pharmacokinetic individualization of busulfan dosage regimens.

N Bleyzac1, G Souillet, P Magron, A Janoly, P Martin, Y Bertrand, C Galambrun, Q Dai, P Maire, R W Jelliffe, G Aulagner.   

Abstract

In order to control busulfan pharmacokinetic variability and toxicity, a specific monitoring protocol was instituted in our bone marrow transplant BMT paediatric patients including a test dose, daily Bayesian forecasting of busulfan plasma levels, and Bayesian individualization of busulfan dosage regimens. Twenty-nine children received BMT after a busulfan-based conditioning regimen. Individual pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained following a 0.5 mg*kg test dose and were used for daily individualization of dosage regimens during the subsequent 4-day course of treatment. Doses were adjusted to reach a target mean AUC per 6 h between 4 and 6 microg.h.ml(+1). Plasma busulfan assays were performed by liquid chromatography. Pharmacokinetic analysis used the USC*PACK software. The performance of the test dose to predict AUC during the busulfan regimen was evaluated. Incidence of toxicity, chimerism and relapse, overall Kaplan-Meier survival, and VOD-free survival were compared after matching our patients (group A) with patients conditioned by using standard doses of busulfan (group B). Busulfan doses were decreased in 69% of patients compared to conventional doses. Expected AUC was significantly correlated with observed AUC and predictability of the test dose was 101.9 +/- 17.9%. Incidence of VOD in group A was 3.4% vs 24.1% in group B, while the incidence of stomatitis was similar. Engraftment was successful in all patients in group A. The rate of full engraftment at 3 months post-BMT was higher in group A (P = 0.012). Long-term overall survival did not differ between the two groups, in contrast to the 90-day survival. VOD-free survival was higher in group A (P = 0.026). Pharmacokinetic monitoring and individualization of busulfan dosage regimen are useful in improving clinical outcome and reducing early mortality in paediatric bone marrow transplant recipients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11781625     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1703207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


  36 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetic monitoring is still required for intravenous busulfan in SCT for small children.

Authors:  Masayuki Nagasawa; Noriko Mitsuiki; Toshiaki Ono; Masatoshi Takagi; Hiromi Oda; Masato Yasuhara; Shuki Mizutani
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 2.490

2.  Effect of weight and maturation on busulfan clearance in infants and small children undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Authors:  Radojka M Savic; Morton J Cowan; Christopher C Dvorak; Sung-Yun Pai; Luis Pereira; Imke H Bartelink; Jaap J Boelens; Robbert G M Bredius; Rob F Wynn; Geoff D E Cuvelier; Peter J Shaw; Mary A Slatter; Janel Long-Boyle
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Intravenous busulfan: in the conditioning treatment of pediatric patients prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Sheridan M Hoy; Katherine A Lyseng-Williamson
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 4.  Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for treatment optimization in clinical oncology.

Authors:  Anthe S Zandvliet; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen; Alwin D R Huitema
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Busulfan dosing algorithm and sampling strategy in stem cell transplantation patients.

Authors:  Francine A de Castro; Chiara Piana; Belinda P Simões; Vera L Lanchote; O Della Pasqua
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Should busulfan therapeutic range be narrowed in pediatrics? Experience from a large cohort of hematopoietic stem cell transplant children.

Authors:  M Philippe; S Goutelle; J Guitton; X Fonrose; C Bergeron; P Girard; Y Bertrand; N Bleyzac
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 5.483

7.  Busulfan in infant to adult hematopoietic cell transplant recipients: a population pharmacokinetic model for initial and Bayesian dose personalization.

Authors:  Jeannine S McCune; Meagan J Bemer; Jeffrey S Barrett; K Scott Baker; Alan S Gamis; Nicholas H G Holford
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Intravenous busulfan for autologous stem cell transplantation in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a survey of 952 patients on behalf of the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Authors:  Arnon Nagler; Myriam Labopin; Norbert-Claude Gorin; Felicetto Ferrara; Miguel A Sanz; Depei Wu; Antonio Torres Gomez; Simona Lapusan; Giuseppe Irrera; Jose E Guimaraes; Aida Botelho Sousa; Angelo M Carella; Norbert Vey; William Arcese; Avichai Shimoni; Raanan Berger; Vanderson Rocha; Mohamad Mohty
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 9.941

9.  Individual dose adjustment of oral busulfan using a test dose in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Yasushi Takamatsu; Noriaki Sasaki; Tetsuya Eto; Koji Nagafuji; Yasunobu Abe; Ilseung Choi; Kentaro Ogata; Shuuji Hara; Junji Suzumiya; Kazuo Tamura
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.490

10.  Variability in the pharmacokinetics of intravenous busulphan given as a single daily dose to paediatric blood or marrow transplant recipients.

Authors:  Christa E Nath; John W Earl; Nalini Pati; Katherine Stephen; Peter J Shaw
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.