Literature DB >> 11781223

Real-time quantitation of minimal residual disease in inv(16)-positive acute myeloid leukemia may indicate risk for clinical relapse and may identify patients in a curable state.

Silvia Buonamici1, Emanuela Ottaviani, Nicoletta Testoni, Vittorio Montefusco, Giuseppe Visani, Francesca Bonifazi, Marilina Amabile, Carolina Terragna, Deborah Ruggeri, Pier Paolo Piccaluga, Alessandro Isidori, Michele Malagola, Michele Baccarani, Sante Tura, Giovanni Martinelli.   

Abstract

The inv(16) cytogenetic subtype of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has a relatively good prognosis. Many patients achieve complete remission (CR). The prognostic uncertainty of negative qualitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays suggests the need to identify prognostically significant critical thresholds by real-time RT-PCR. A reliable and sensitive (10(-5)) real-time RT-PCR assay was set up for the evaluation of relevant CBFbeta-MYH11/ABL transcript ratios and was applied to the 21 patients with inv(16) AML routinely referred for cytogenetic and molecular monitoring in Seràgnoli Institute (Bologna, Italy) since 1990. Among the 18 patients who underwent ablative chemotherapy, all achieved CR with a 3-year disease-free survival probability of 63% (95% CI, 40%-87%) and no recorded events after 26 months. Five patients had relapses; 2 died of disease and 3 entered second CR. Analysis of the 125 bone marrow (or peripheral blood) samples studied by real-time RT-PCR showed that transcript ratios of samples taken during CR at any time before a relapse were always greater than 0.12%, whereas those of samples taken during first or second CR from patients who did not subsequently have relapses were always less than 0.25%. This suggests that transcript ratios greater than 0.25% may correspond to high risk for relapse, whereas ratios below 0.12% might indicate the patient is in a curable state. If confirmed, such thresholds could open the way to a new phase in post-CR therapeutic decision making for patients with inv(16) AML.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11781223     DOI: 10.1182/blood.v99.2.443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  20 in total

Review 1.  Overview of therapy and strategies for optimizing outcomes in de novo pediatric acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Kelly Faulk; Lia Gore; Todd Cooper
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 2.  Detection of minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Maria R Baer
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  t(9;19)(q22;p13) in Acute Myelomonocytic Leukemia.

Authors:  Moeinadin Safavi; Akbar Safaei; Marzieh Hosseini
Journal:  Turk J Haematol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 1.831

4.  Monitoring minimal residual disease in leukemia using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction for Wilms tumor gene (WT1).

Authors:  Hiroya Tamaki; Machiko Mishima; Manabu Kawakami; Akihiro Tsuboi; Eui Ho Kim; Naoki Hosen; Kazuhiro Ikegame; Masaki Murakami; Tatsuya Fujioka; Tomoki Masuda; Yuki Taniguchi; Sumiyuki Nishida; Kazuoki Osumi; Toshihiro Soma; Yusuke Oji; Yoshihiro Oka; Ichiro Kawase; Haruo Sugiyama; Hiroyasu Ogawa
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 5.  Children's Oncology Group's 2013 blueprint for research: acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Alan S Gamis; Todd A Alonzo; John P Perentesis; Soheil Meshinchi
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 6.  Minimal residual disease quantitation in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  David Shook; Elaine Coustan-Smith; Raul C Ribeiro; Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Dario Campana
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma       Date:  2009

7.  Comparative analysis of different approaches to measure treatment response in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Hiroto Inaba; Elaine Coustan-Smith; Xueyuan Cao; Stanley B Pounds; Sheila A Shurtleff; Kathleen Y Wang; Susana C Raimondi; Mihaela Onciu; Jeffrey Jacobsen; Raul C Ribeiro; Gary V Dahl; W Paul Bowman; Jeffrey W Taub; Barbara Degar; Wing Leung; James R Downing; Ching-Hon Pui; Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Dario Campana
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  EVI1 induces myelodysplastic syndrome in mice.

Authors:  Silvia Buonamici; Donglan Li; Yiqing Chi; Rui Zhao; Xuerong Wang; Larry Brace; Hongyu Ni; Yogen Saunthararajah; Giuseppina Nucifora
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Monitoring of acute myeloid leukemia by flow cytometry.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kern; Susanne Schnittger
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.075

10.  Monitoring AML1-ETO and CBFbeta-MYH11 transcripts in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  John A Liu Yin; Lindsay Frost
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.