Literature DB >> 11781161

Exposure assessment to dioxins from the use of tampons and diapers.

Michael J DeVito1, Arnold Schecter.   

Abstract

Over the past several years there has been concern over exposure to dioxins through the use of tampons and other sanitary products. This article describes attempts to estimate dioxin exposures from tampons and infant diapers; we then compare exposure estimates to dietary dioxin exposures. We analyzed four brands of tampons and four brands of infant diapers obtained from commercial establishments in San Francisco, California, for dioxin concentrations. We estimated exposures to dioxins on the basis of a screening level analysis that assumed all dioxins present were completely absorbed. We also estimated exposures by using a more refined analysis that incorporates partition coefficients to estimate bioavailability. None of the products contained 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, the most potent dioxin, although other dioxins were present at detectable concentrations in all samples. We observed minimal differences in the concentrations of dioxins between 100% cotton and cotton/pulp products. The refined exposure analysis indicates that exposures to dioxins from tampons are approximately 13,000-240,000 times less than dietary exposures. The refined exposure analysis showed that exposure to dioxins from the diet is more than 30,000-2,200,000 times the exposure through diapers in nursing infants. Although dioxins are found in trace amounts in both cotton and pulp sanitary products, exposure to dioxins through tampons and diapers does not significantly contribute to dioxin exposures in the United States.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11781161      PMCID: PMC1240689          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.0211023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  22 in total

1.  Serum dioxin level in relation to diabetes mellitus among Air Force veterans with background levels of exposure.

Authors:  M P Longnecker; J E Michalek
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  PCDD/Fs in textiles--part II: transfer from clothing to human skin.

Authors:  J Klasmeier; A Mühlebach; M S McLachlan
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 7.086

3.  Effect of prenatal exposure to TCDD on the promotion of endometriotic lesion growth by TCDD in adult female rats and mice.

Authors:  A M Cummings; J M Hedge; L S Birnbaum
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Subchronic exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin modulates the pathophysiology of endometriosis in the cynomolgus monkey.

Authors:  J Z Yang; S K Agarwal; W G Foster
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Cancer, heart disease, and diabetes in workers exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.

Authors:  K Steenland; L Piacitelli; J Deddens; M Fingerhut; L I Chang
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1999-05-05       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Partitioning of dioxins, dibenzofurans, and coplanar PCBS in blood, milk, adipose tissue, placenta and cord blood from five American women.

Authors:  A Schecter; I Kassis; O Päpke
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  1998 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 7.  The aryl hydrocarbon receptor: a comparative perspective.

Authors:  M E Hahn
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol C Pharmacol Toxicol Endocrinol       Date:  1998-11

8.  Bioavailability of dioxin in soil from a 2,4,5-T manufacturing site.

Authors:  T H Umbreit; E J Hesse; M A Gallo
Journal:  Science       Date:  1986-04-25       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Congener-specific levels of dioxins and dibenzofurans in U.S. food and estimated daily dioxin toxic equivalent intake.

Authors:  A Schecter; J Startin; C Wright; M Kelly; O Päpke; A Lis; M Ball; J R Olson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Calculation of 2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalent concentrations of complex environmental contaminant mixtures.

Authors:  G Eadon; L Kaminsky; J Silkworth; K Aldous; D Hilker; P O'Keefe; R Smith; J Gierthy; J Hawley; N Kim
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Menstrual Products as a Source of Environmental Chemical Exposure: A Review from the Epidemiologic Perspective.

Authors:  Kristen Upson; Jenni A Shearston; Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2022-03-17

Review 2.  Device-Associated Menstrual Toxic Shock Syndrome.

Authors:  Patrick M Schlievert; Catherine C Davis
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Activation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling by cotton balls used for environmental enrichment.

Authors:  Shelley A Tischkau; Motoko Mukai
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 4.  Dermal Exposure to Hazardous Chemicals in Baby Diapers: A Re-Evaluation of the Quantitative Health Risk Assessment Conducted by The French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety (ANSES).

Authors:  Alfred Bernard
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Inapt management of menstrual hygiene waste (MHW): An urgent global environmental and public health challenge in developed and developing countries.

Authors:  Uttpal Anand; Meththika Vithanage; Anushka Upamali Rajapaksha; Abhijit Dey; Sunita Varjani; Elza Bontempi
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-07-03

Review 6.  Healthy, safe and responsible: the modern female traveller.

Authors:  Irmgard L Bauer
Journal:  Trop Dis Travel Med Vaccines       Date:  2021-06-05

7.  A question for women's health: chemicals in feminine hygiene products and personal lubricants.

Authors:  Wendee Nicole
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Volatile organic compounds in feminine hygiene products sold in the US market: A survey of products and health risks.

Authors:  Nan Lin; Ning Ding; Emily Meza-Wilson; Amila Manuradha Devasurendra; Christopher Godwin; Sung Kyun Park; Stuart Batterman
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 9.621

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.