Literature DB >> 11779827

Genomes in flux: the evolution of archaeal and proteobacterial gene content.

Berend Snel1, Peer Bork, Martijn A Huynen.   

Abstract

In the course of evolution, genomes are shaped by processes like gene loss, gene duplication, horizontal gene transfer, and gene genesis (the de novo origin of genes). Here we reconstruct the gene content of ancestral Archaea and Proteobacteria and quantify the processes connecting them to their present day representatives based on the distribution of genes in completely sequenced genomes. We estimate that the ancestor of the Proteobacteria contained around 2500 genes, and the ancestor of the Archaea around 2050 genes. Although it is necessary to invoke horizontal gene transfer to explain the content of present day genomes, gene loss, gene genesis, and simple vertical inheritance are quantitatively the most dominant processes in shaping the genome. Together they result in a turnover of gene content such that even the lineage leading from the ancestor of the Proteobacteria to the relatively large genome of Escherichia coli has lost at least 950 genes. Gene loss, unlike the other processes, correlates fairly well with time. This clock-like behavior suggests that gene loss is under negative selection, while the processes that add genes are under positive selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11779827     DOI: 10.1101/gr.176501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  154 in total

1.  The genetic core of the universal ancestor.

Authors:  J Kirk Harris; Scott T Kelley; George B Spiegelman; Norman R Pace
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Gene loss, protein sequence divergence, gene dispensability, expression level, and interactivity are correlated in eukaryotic evolution.

Authors:  Dmitri M Krylov; Yuri I Wolf; Igor B Rogozin; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Comprehensive analysis of orthologous protein domains using the HOPS database.

Authors:  Christian E V Storm; Erik L L Sonnhammer
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Imbroglios of viral taxonomy: genetic exchange and failings of phenetic approaches.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Lawrence; Graham F Hatfull; Roger W Hendrix
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Coelomata and not Ecdysozoa: evidence from genome-wide phylogenetic analysis.

Authors:  Yuri I Wolf; Igor B Rogozin; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  The balance of driving forces during genome evolution in prokaryotes.

Authors:  Victor Kunin; Christos A Ouzounis
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 7.  Horizontal gene transfer: a critical view.

Authors:  C G Kurland; B Canback; Otto G Berg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-08-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Computational inference of scenarios for alpha-proteobacterial genome evolution.

Authors:  Bastien Boussau; E Olof Karlberg; A Carolin Frank; Boris-Antoine Legault; Siv G E Andersson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-21       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The consistent phylogenetic signal in genome trees revealed by reducing the impact of noise.

Authors:  Bas E Dutilh; Martijn A Huynen; William J Bruno; Berend Snel
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 10.  Phylogenetic framework and molecular signatures for the main clades of the phylum Actinobacteria.

Authors:  Beile Gao; Radhey S Gupta
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 11.056

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.