Literature DB >> 11779322

Management of ingested foreign bodies: a retrospective review of 5240 patients.

H C Lam1, J K Woo, C A van Hasselt.   

Abstract

This review was carried out to assess the effectiveness of our protocol designed for the management of ingested foreign bodies. It was a retrospective review of 5240 patients with ingested foreign bodies admitted over a five-year period to the Ear Nose and Throat Unit. These patients were managed according to a standardized protocol which was adopted and modified from our previous study. Under his management protocol, the mean hospital stay was 1.6 days. Flexible oesophagoscopy under local anaesthesia, and rigid oesophagoscopy under general anaesthesia, were performed in 1.5 per cent and 7.7 per cent of cases respectively. Major complications including oesophageal perforation and deep neck abscesses occurred in 0.19 per cent of patients. There was no mortality. This management protocol for ingested foreign bodies was both safe and cost-effective when compared to similar studies reported in the literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11779322     DOI: 10.1258/0022215011909756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laryngol Otol        ISSN: 0022-2151            Impact factor:   1.469


  18 in total

1.  Neglected partial denture in the lower oesophagus presenting after 7 days.

Authors:  Vinoth Boopathy; Satvinder Singh Bakshi; Padhmini Balasubramanian; Suganthy Dakshinamoorthy
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-09-30

2.  Cardiac tamponade due to ingested gastric foreign body.

Authors:  Mark Kelly; Neil Ferguson; Robert Sutcliffe; Andrew Forsyth; Donald Manifold
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  A foreign body larger than the overtube diameter: a case of a large cow foot bone causing esophageal impaction.

Authors:  Arun Swaminath; Aimee Lee Lucas; Kristina Capiak; Amrita Sethi; Reuben Garcia-Carrasquillo
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2010-12

4.  The management of acute oesophageal obstruction from a food bolus. Can we be more conservative?

Authors:  A Tsikoudas; X Kochillas; R J Kelleher; R Mills
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Buscopan in oesophageal food bolus: is it really effective?

Authors:  S Basavaraj; K R Penumetcha; H R Cable; N Umapathy
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Causes of bolus impaction in the esophagus.

Authors:  Gabriele I Kirchner; Ina Zuber-Jerger; Esther Endlicher; Cornelia Gelbmann; Claudia Ott; Petra Ruemmele; Jürgen Schölmerich; Frank Klebl
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Emergency care of esophageal foreign body impactions: timing, treatment modalities, and resource utilization.

Authors:  S D Crockett; S L W Sperry; C Brock Miller; N J Shaheen; E S Dellon
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 3.429

8.  Cervical Osteophytes Increase the Risk for Foreign Body Impaction: A 171-Patient Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Hagit Shoffel-Havakuk; Sharon Cahanovitc; Meital Adi; Oded Cohen; Yaara Haimovich; Yonatan Lahav; Doron Halperin
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.438

9.  Flexible versus rigid endoscopy for treatment of foreign body impaction in the esophagus.

Authors:  D Gmeiner; B H A von Rahden; C Meco; J Hutter; G Oberascher; H J Stein
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  A review of the current management of impacted foreign bodies in the oesophagus in adults.

Authors:  Senthil K Balasubramaniam; Dominic Bray; Myles I Black; N Y Salama; David B Mitchell
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.