Literature DB >> 117792

Genetic basis of aristal morphology in Drosophila melanogaster and its correlation with behavior: selection for increased and decreased aristal branching.

D W Pyle, R C Richmond.   

Abstract

The aristae of Drosophila have been shown to play a role in mating behavior and geotaxis. Two populations of D. melanogaster were selected for increased and decreased numbers of major aristal branches. Selection was successful and resulted in two lines differing by an average of six aristal branches. Hybridization analyses of selected lines revealed that genes influencing aristal branching are located on both the X chromosome and the autosomes. Polygenic control of aristal morphology is indicated by a gradual response to selection and low realized heritabilities. When selection was relaxed for 19 generations, the number of aristal branches did not revert to the number in the control line. Changes in aristal branching did not appear to have a consistent influence on geotaxis, although there was a tendency for flies with fewer aristal branches to be geonegative. Neither mating speed nor ethological isolation between the two populations was affected by selection. It is concluded that the number of aristal branches in Drosophila is a neutral trait (i.e., not subject to natural selection) under laboratory conditions. Correlations between aristal morphology and behavior found in other selection experiments by previous investigators were likely due to linkage disequilibria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 117792     DOI: 10.1007/bf01068208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  11 in total

1.  Studies in experimental behavior genetics. II. Individual differences in geotaxis as a function of chromosome variations in synthesized Drosophila populations.

Authors:  J HIRSCH
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1959-06

2.  SELECTION FOR GEOTAXIS IN MONOMORPHIC AND POLYMORPHIC POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA.

Authors:  T Dobzhansky; B Spassky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Morphological Differences between DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA Populations Selected for opposite Geotaxes and Phototaxes.

Authors:  G Pasteur
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  GENOTYPE FREQUENCY AND MATING SUCCESS IN THE WILLISTONI SPECIES GROUP OF DROSOPHILA.

Authors:  Lee Ehrman; Claudine Petit
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1968-12       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Effects of selection and migration on geotactic and phototactic behaviour of Drosophila. II.

Authors:  T Dobzhansky; B Spassky; J Sved
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1969-05-20

6.  The love song of the fruit fly.

Authors:  H C Bennet-Clark; A W Ewing
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 2.142

7.  Effects of artificial selection on reproductive fitness in Drosophila.

Authors:  D W Pyle
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-09-23       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Letter: Courtship stimuli in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  H C Bennet-Clark; M Dow; A W Ewing; A Manning; F von Schilcher
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 2.805

Review 9.  Courtship behavior in Drosophila.

Authors:  H T Spieth
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 19.686

10.  Antennae and sexual receptivity in Drosophila melanogaster females.

Authors:  A Manning
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-10-06       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.