Literature DB >> 11778105

[Patient controlled regional analgesia (PCRA) in surgery of stiff elbow: elastomeric vs electronic pump].

H van Oven1, V Agnoletti, B Borghi, N Montone, F Stagni.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aim of this study is to confront an elastomeric pump at regular infusion controlled by the patient with an electronic pump with self-administration for analgesia, by continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus block, as support for the intensive postoperative physiotherapy.
METHODS: With signed informed consent 10 patients undergoing corrective surgery for stiff elbow were included. All patients received ropivacaine 30 ml 0,50% for anaesthesia by infraclavicular block with bicipite twitch, after which a catheter was left in situ. In group 1 analgesia consisted of ropivacaina 0,4% by electronic pump (continuous infusion with self-administration of bolus) at day1 and day2, and by elastomeric pump at 5 ml/h, connected to a three way tap managed by the patient (open-closed) at day3 and day4. Group 2 received at day1 and day2 the elastomeric pump and then the electronic pump. All patients continued at home with the elastomeric pump. Flexion-extension capacity of the elbow, daily consumption of ropivacaine 0,4%, and patients comfort were all evaluated.
RESULTS: With the electronic pump, flexion-extension capacity is significantly better compared to elastomeric pump. During the use of the electronic pump, consumption of ropivacaina 0.4% was significantly higher in day2 compared to day1 (physiotherapy started day2); consumption in day3 and Day4 was significantly less compared to day2. All patients preferred the electronic pump for the first two days and then the elastomeric pump.
CONCLUSION: PCRA quality is higher with ropivacaine 0,4% during the first phase of recovery. The elastomeric pump instead, insufficient in the first phase, is useful for analgesia at home.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11778105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol        ISSN: 0375-9393            Impact factor:   3.051


  4 in total

1.  Effects of local anesthetic concentration and dose on continuous interscalene nerve blocks: a dual-center, randomized, observer-masked, controlled study.

Authors:  Linda T Le; Vanessa J Loland; Edward R Mariano; J C Gerancher; Anupama N Wadhwa; Elizabeth M Renehan; Daniel I Sessler; Jonathan J Shuster; Douglas W Theriaque; Rosalita C Maldonado; Brian M Ilfeld
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.288

2.  [Perioperative pain therapy in interventions for elbow stiffness].

Authors:  S Goebel; J Broscheit
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  The effects of local anesthetic concentration and dose on continuous infraclavicular nerve blocks: a multicenter, randomized, observer-masked, controlled study.

Authors:  Brian M Ilfeld; Linda T Le; Joanne Ramjohn; Vanessa J Loland; Anupama N Wadhwa; J C Gerancher; Elizabeth M Renehan; Daniel I Sessler; Jonathan J Shuster; Douglas W Theriaque; Rosalita C Maldonado; Edward R Mariano
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  The effects of varying local anesthetic concentration and volume on continuous popliteal sciatic nerve blocks: a dual-center, randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Brian M Ilfeld; Vanessa J Loland; J C Gerancher; Anupama N Wadhwa; Elizabeth M Renehan; Daniel I Sessler; Jonathan J Shuster; Douglas W Theriaque; Rosalita C Maldonado; Edward R Mariano
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.108

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.