Literature DB >> 11777881

A randomised trial to investigate the efficacy of magnesium sulphate for refractory ventricular fibrillation.

T B Hassan1, C Jagger, D B Barnett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ventricular fibrillation (VF) remains the most salvageable rhythm in patients suffering a cardiopulmonary arrest (CA). However, outcome remains poor if there is no response to initial defibrillation. Some evidence suggests that intravenous magnesium may prove to be an effective antiarrhythmic agent in such circumstances. STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Intravenous magnesium sulphate given early in the resuscitation phase for patients in refractory VF (VF after 3 DC shocks) or recurring VF will significantly improve their outcome, defined as a return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and discharge from hospital alive.
DESIGN: A randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial. Pre-defined primary and secondary endpoints were ROSC at the scene or in accident and emergency (A&E) and discharge from hospital alive respectively. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND INTERVENTION: Patients in CA with refractory or recurrent VF treated in the prehospital phase by the county emergency medical services and/or in the A&E department. One hundred and five patients with refractory VF were recruited over a 15 month period and randomised to receive either 2-4 g of magnesium sulphate or placebo intravenously.
RESULTS: Fifty two patients received magnesium treatment and 53 received placebo. The two groups were matched for most parameters including sex, response time for arrival at scene and airway interventions. There were no significant differences between magnesium and placebo for ROSC at the scene or A&E (17% v 13%). The 4% difference had 95% confidence intervals (CI) ranging from -10% to +18%. For patients being alive to discharge from hospital (4% v 2%) the difference was 2% (95% CI -7% to +11%). After adjustment for potential confounding variables (age, witnessed arrest, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and system response time), the odds ratio (95% CI) for ROSC in patients treated with magnesium as compared with placebo was 1.69 (0.54 to 5.30).
CONCLUSION: Intravenous magnesium given early in patients suffering CA with refractory or recurrent VF did not significantly improve the proportion with a ROSC or who were discharged from hospital alive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11777881      PMCID: PMC1725791          DOI: 10.1136/emj.19.1.57

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  23 in total

Review 1.  Improving survival from sudden cardiac arrest: the "chain of survival" concept. A statement for health professionals from the Advanced Cardiac Life Support Subcommittee and the Emergency Cardiac Care Committee, American Heart Association.

Authors:  R O Cummins; J P Ornato; W H Thies; P E Pepe
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Magnesium in cardiac arrest (the magic trial).

Authors:  D M Fatovich; D A Prentice; G J Dobb
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 3.  Recommended guidelines for uniform reporting of data from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the Utstein Style. Task Force of the American Heart Association, the European Resuscitation Council, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, and the Australian Resuscitation Council.

Authors:  R O Cummins; D A Chamberlain; N S Abramson; M Allen; P Baskett; L Becker; L Bossaert; H Delooz; W Dick; M Eisenberg
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 4.  Possible pharmacological actions of magnesium in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  K L Woods
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Ambulatory sudden cardiac death: mechanisms of production of fatal arrhythmia on the basis of data from 157 cases.

Authors:  A Bayés de Luna; P Coumel; J F Leclercq
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Association of drug therapy with survival in cardiac arrest: limited role of advanced cardiac life support drugs.

Authors:  I G Stiell; G A Wells; P C Hebert; A Laupacis; B N Weitzman
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.451

7.  Resuscitation from prolonged cardiac arrest with high-dose intravenous magnesium sulfate.

Authors:  L Craddock; B Miller; G Clifton; B Krumbach; W Pluss
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.484

8.  Successful resuscitation and neurologic recovery from refractory ventricular fibrillation after magnesium sulfate administration.

Authors:  R C Tobey; G A Birnbaum; J R Allegra; M S Horowitz; J J Plosay
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 9.  Magnesium therapy of cardiac arrhythmias in critical-care medicine.

Authors:  L T Iseri; B J Allen; M A Brodsky
Journal:  Magnesium       Date:  1989

10.  Cardiac arrest and resuscitation: a tale of 29 cities.

Authors:  M S Eisenberg; B T Horwood; R O Cummins; R Reynolds-Haertle; T R Hearne
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.721

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Best evidence topic report. Intravenous magnesium in shock-resistant tachyarrhythmias.

Authors:  Ayan Sen; Shweta Gidwani
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  2018 American Heart Association Focused Update on Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support Use of Antiarrhythmic Drugs During and Immediately After Cardiac Arrest: An Update to the American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

Authors:  Ashish R Panchal; Katherine M Berg; Peter J Kudenchuk; Marina Del Rios; Karen G Hirsch; Mark S Link; Michael C Kurz; Paul S Chan; José G Cabañas; Peter T Morley; Mary Fran Hazinski; Michael W Donnino
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Biochemical profile and outcomes in trauma patients subjected to open cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a prospective observational pilot study.

Authors:  Beat Schnüriger; Peep Talving; Kenji Inaba; Galinos Barmparas; Bernardino C Branco; Lydia Lam; Demetrios Demetriades
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4. 

Authors:  J P Nolan; C D Deakin; J Soar; B W Böttiger; G Smith; M Baubin; B Dirks; V Wenzel
Journal:  Notf Rett Med       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 0.826

Review 5.  Advances in the acute pharmacologic management of cardiac arrhythmias.

Authors:  Andrea Sarkozy; Paul Dorian
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  [Which drugs are useful during resuscitation? Which are not?].

Authors:  Wilhelm Haverkamp
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2016-02-03

Review 7.  Refractory Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Madhan Shanmugasundaram; Kapildeo Lotun
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2018

8.  Clinical trials in cardiac arrest and subarachnoid hemorrhage: lessons from the past and ideas for the future.

Authors:  Jennifer A Frontera
Journal:  Stroke Res Treat       Date:  2013-03-07

Review 9.  Antiarrhythmia drugs for cardiac arrest: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu Huang; Qing He; Min Yang; Lei Zhan
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Part 6. Pediatric advanced life support: 2015 Korean Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

Authors:  Do Kyun Kim; Won Kyoung Jhang; Ji Yun Ahn; Ji Sook Lee; Yoon Hee Kim; Bongjin Lee; Gi Beom Kim; Jin-Tae Kim; June Huh; June Dong Park; Sung Phil Chung; Sung Oh Hwang
Journal:  Clin Exp Emerg Med       Date:  2016-07-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.