Literature DB >> 11777770

Cancers detected and induced, and associated risk and benefit, in a breast screening programme.

J Law1, K Faulkner.   

Abstract

Current cancer detection rates and dose levels in the UK Breast Screening Programme are used to compare numbers of cancers detected with numbers predicted to be induced by the screening process itself. Numbers of those detected are shown to exceed those induced by a large margin for women aged over 50 years. The associated benefit/risk ratio is also considered. For younger women this margin is progressively reduced but remains positive at least down to age 40 years, and possibly beyond. Women both with and without a family history of breast cancer are considered. Some implications for familial breast screening programmes are discussed. Some caution may be required before annual screening of women below the age of 35 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11777770     DOI: 10.1259/bjr.74.888.741121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  12 in total

Review 1.  [Mammography screening in Germany].

Authors:  S Diekmann; F Diekmann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Comparison of radiation exposure and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from mammography and molecular imaging of the breast.

Authors:  Michael K O'Connor; Hua Li; Deborah J Rhodes; Carrie B Hruska; Conor B Clancy; Richard J Vetter
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Detection of microcalcifications by characteristic magnetic susceptibility effects using MR phase image cross-correlation analysis.

Authors:  Richard A Baheza; E Brian Welch; Daniel F Gochberg; Melinda Sanders; Sara Harvey; John C Gore; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Impact of the digitalisation of mammography on performance parameters and breast dose in the Flemish Breast Cancer Screening Programme.

Authors:  Lore Timmermans; An De Hauwere; Klaus Bacher; Hilde Bosmans; Kim Lemmens; Luc Bleyen; Erik Van Limbergen; Patrick Martens; Andre Van Steen; Griet Mortier; Koen Van Herck; Hubert Thierens
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Systematic review: surveillance for breast cancer in women treated with chest radiation for childhood, adolescent, or young adult cancer.

Authors:  Tara O Henderson; Alison Amsterdam; Smita Bhatia; Melissa M Hudson; Anna T Meadows; Joseph P Neglia; Lisa R Diller; Louis S Constine; Robert A Smith; Martin C Mahoney; Elizabeth A Morris; Leslie L Montgomery; Wendy Landier; Stephanie M Smith; Leslie L Robison; Kevin C Oeffinger
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 6.  Exposure to low-dose radiation and the risk of breast cancer among women with a familial or genetic predisposition: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marijke C Jansen-van der Weide; Marcel J W Greuter; Liesbeth Jansen; Jan C Oosterwijk; Ruud M Pijnappel; Geertruida H de Bock
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Intensified surveillance for early detection of breast cancer in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Ulrich Bick
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Cancer screening with digital mammography for women at average risk for breast cancer, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for women at high risk: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-03-01

9.  Population-based mammography screening below age 50: balancing radiation-induced vs prevented breast cancer deaths.

Authors:  R de Gelder; G Draisma; E A M Heijnsdijk; H J de Koning
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  Should women under 50 be screened for breast cancer?

Authors:  S Moss
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-08-02       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.