BACKGROUND: Elective lymph node dissection (ELND) may contribute to a survival benefit in certain stratified subsets of melanoma patients. We hypothesized that lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (with complete node dissection if metastases are present) may improve both staging and survival of patients with clinically negative nodes, without subjecting all patients to the morbidity associated with complete ELND. METHODS: We reviewed the data for all 14,914 N0 patients of the AJCC Melanoma Staging Database to determine the effect of SLN biopsy and ELND on staging and survival. RESULTS: Retrospective analysis revealed that there was an apparent statistically significant survival advantage to SLN biopsy in patients with melanomas > 1 mm (n = 9024; 68.5% and 26.2% reduction in mortality compared with patients staged to be N0 by clinical exam and ELND, respectively; P < .0001). Five-year survivals were 90.5%, 77.7%, and 69.8%, respectfully, for patients staged by SLN biopsy (n = 2552), ELND (n = 2014), and clinical examination alone (n = 5192). The survival advantage of SLN biopsy was statistically significant for each T-stage category (T2, T3, and T4) and ulceration status. There was no advantage to SLN biopsy in patients with melanomas <1 mm (n = 5890). CONCLUSIONS: SLN biopsy provides more accurate staging and may contribute to a survival benefit in populations of patients with melanoma.
BACKGROUND: Elective lymph node dissection (ELND) may contribute to a survival benefit in certain stratified subsets of melanomapatients. We hypothesized that lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (with complete node dissection if metastases are present) may improve both staging and survival of patients with clinically negative nodes, without subjecting all patients to the morbidity associated with complete ELND. METHODS: We reviewed the data for all 14,914 N0 patients of the AJCC Melanoma Staging Database to determine the effect of SLN biopsy and ELND on staging and survival. RESULTS: Retrospective analysis revealed that there was an apparent statistically significant survival advantage to SLN biopsy in patients with melanomas > 1 mm (n = 9024; 68.5% and 26.2% reduction in mortality compared with patients staged to be N0 by clinical exam and ELND, respectively; P < .0001). Five-year survivals were 90.5%, 77.7%, and 69.8%, respectfully, for patients staged by SLN biopsy (n = 2552), ELND (n = 2014), and clinical examination alone (n = 5192). The survival advantage of SLN biopsy was statistically significant for each T-stage category (T2, T3, and T4) and ulceration status. There was no advantage to SLN biopsy in patients with melanomas <1 mm (n = 5890). CONCLUSIONS: SLN biopsy provides more accurate staging and may contribute to a survival benefit in populations of patients with melanoma.
Authors: Charles M Balch; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Seng-Jaw Soong; John F Thompson; Shouluan Ding; David R Byrd; Natale Cascinelli; Alistair J Cochran; Daniel G Coit; Alexander M Eggermont; Timothy Johnson; John M Kirkwood; Stanley P Leong; Kelly M McMasters; Martin C Mihm; Donald L Morton; Merrick I Ross; Vernon K Sondak Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-04-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Robert H I Andtbacka; Victor G Prieto; Marcella M Johnson; A Hafeez Diwan; Jeffrey E Lee; Paul F Mansfield; Janice N Cormier; Christopher W Schacherer; Merrick I Ross Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-07-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Charles M Balch; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Seng-Jaw Soong; John F Thompson; Michael B Atkins; David R Byrd; Antonio C Buzaid; Alistair J Cochran; Daniel G Coit; Shouluan Ding; Alexander M Eggermont; Keith T Flaherty; Phyllis A Gimotty; John M Kirkwood; Kelly M McMasters; Martin C Mihm; Donald L Morton; Merrick I Ross; Arthur J Sober; Vernon K Sondak Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-11-16 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Robert B Rebhun; Alexander J F Lazar; Isaiah J Fidler; Jeffrey E Gershenwald Journal: Clin Exp Metastasis Date: 2008-02-09 Impact factor: 5.150
Authors: David Y Lee; Kelly T Huynh; Annabelle Teng; Briana J Lau; Sarah Vitug; Ji-Hey Lee; Stacey L Stern; Leland J Foshag; Mark B Faries Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2015-11-19 Impact factor: 5.344