Literature DB >> 11776360

The relationship between perception and acoustics for a high-low vowel contrast produced by speakers with dysarthria.

K Bunton1, G Weismer.   

Abstract

This study was designed to explore the relationship between perception of a high-low vowel contrast and its acoustic correlates in tokens produced by persons with motor speech disorders. An intelligibility test designed by Kent, Weismer, Kent, and Rosenbek (1989a) groups target and error words in minimal-pair contrasts. This format allows for construction of phonetic error profiles based on listener responses, thus allowing for a direct comparison of the acoustic characteristics of vowels perceived as the intended target with those heard as something other than the target. The high-low vowel contrast was found to be a consistent error across clinical groups and therefore was selected for acoustic analysis. The contrast was expected to have well-defined acoustic measures or correlates, derived from the literature, that directly relate to a listeners' responses for that token. These measures include the difference between the second and first formant frequency (F2-F1), the difference between F1 and the fundamental frequency (FO), and vowel duration. Results showed that the acoustic characteristics of tongue-height errors were not clearly differentiated from the acoustic characteristics of targets. Rather, the acoustic characteristics of errors often looked like noisy (nonprototypical) versions of the targets. Results are discussed in terms of the test from which the errors were derived and within the framework of speech perception theory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11776360     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2001/095)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  13 in total

1.  Vowel acoustics in dysarthria: mapping to perception.

Authors:  Kaitlin L Lansford; Julie M Liss
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  An evaluation of articulatory working space area in vowel production of adults with Down syndrome.

Authors:  Kate Bunton; Mark Leddy
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 1.346

3.  New and old directions.

Authors:  Frank Buckley
Journal:  Downs Syndr Res Pract       Date:  2007-07

4.  Automatic assessment of vowel space area.

Authors:  Steven Sandoval; Visar Berisha; Rene L Utianski; Julie M Liss; Andreas Spanias
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Computer-Mediated Assessment of Intelligibility in Aphasia and Apraxia of Speech.

Authors:  Katarina L Haley; Heidi Roth; Enetta Grindstaff; Adam Jacks
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.773

6.  Vowel contrast and speech intelligibility in dysarthria.

Authors:  Heejin Kim; Mark Hasegawa-Johnson; Adrienne Perlman
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 0.849

7.  Gender difference in speech intelligibility using speech intelligibility tests and acoustic analyses.

Authors:  Ho-Beom Kwon
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  Formant centralization ratio: a proposal for a new acoustic measure of dysarthric speech.

Authors:  Shimon Sapir; Lorraine O Ramig; Jennifer L Spielman; Cynthia Fox
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Impairment of vowel articulation as a possible marker of disease progression in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Sabine Skodda; Wenke Grönheit; Uwe Schlegel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Investigating Acoustic Correlates of Intelligibility Gains and Losses During Slowed Speech: A Hybridization Approach.

Authors:  Frits van Brenk; Alexander Kain; Kris Tjaden
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.408

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.