Literature DB >> 11774848

Dental resin composites containing silica-fused whiskers--effects of whisker-to-silica ratio on fracture toughness and indentation properties.

Hockin H K Xu1, Janet B Quinn, Douglas T Smith, Joseph M Antonucci, Gary E Schumacher, Frederick C Eichmiller.   

Abstract

Dental resin composites need to be strengthened in order to improve their performance in large stress-bearing applications such as crowns and multiple-unit restorations. Recently, silica-fused ceramic whiskers were used to reinforce dental composites, and the whisker-to-silica ratio was found to be a key microstructural parameter that determined the composite strength. The aim of this study was to further investigate the effects of whisker-to-silica ratio on the fracture toughness, elastic modulus, hardness and brittleness of the composite. Silica particles and silicon carbide whiskers were mixed at whisker:silica mass ratios of 0:1, 1:5. 1:2, 1:1, 2:1, 5:1, and 1:0. Each mixture was thermally fused, silanized and combined with a dental resin at a filler mass percentage of 60%. Fracture toughness was measured with a single-edge notched beam method. Elastic modulus and hardness were measured with a nano-indentation system. Whisker:silica ratio had significant effects on composite properties. The composite toughness (mean+/-SD; n = 9) at whisker:silica = 2:1 was (2.47+/-0.28) MPa m(1/2), significantly higher than (1.02+/-0.23) at whisker:silica = 0:1, (1.13+/-0.19) of a prosthetic composite control, and (0.95+/-0.11) of an inlay/onlay composite control (Tukey's at family confidence coefficient = 0.95). Elastic modulus increased monotonically and hardness plateaued with increasing the whisker:silica ratio. Increasing the whisker:silica ratio also decreased the composite brittleness, which became about 1/3 of that of the inlay:onlay control. Electron microscopy revealed relatively flat fracture surfaces for the controls, but much rougher ones for the whisker composites, with fracture steps and whisker pullout contributing to toughness. The whiskers appeared to be well-bonded with the matrix, probably due to the fused silica producing rough whisker surfaces. Reinforcement with silica-fused whiskers resulted in novel dental composites that possessed fracture toughness two times higher than, and brittleness less than half of current dental composites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11774848     DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00178-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  12 in total

1.  The influence of FRCs reinforcement on marginal adaptation of CAD/CAM composite resin endocrowns after simulated fatigue loading.

Authors:  Giovanni Tommaso Rocca; Carlo Massimo Saratti; Antoine Poncet; Albert J Feilzer; Ivo Krejci
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Effects of calcium phosphate nanoparticles on Ca-PO4 composite.

Authors:  H H K Xu; M D Weir; L Sun; S Takagi; L C Chow
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  Nanocomposites with Ca and PO4 release: effects of reinforcement, dicalcium phosphate particle size and silanization.

Authors:  Hockin H K Xu; Michael D Weir; Limin Sun
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 5.304

4.  Novel F-releasing composite with improved mechanical properties.

Authors:  L Ling; X Xu; G-Y Choi; D Billodeaux; G Guo; R M Diwan
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.116

5.  Effect of filler level and particle size on dental caries-inhibiting Ca-PO(4) composite.

Authors:  Hockin H K Xu; Michael D Weir; Limin Sun; Scott Ngai; Shozo Takagi; Laurence C Chow
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 6.  Degradation, fatigue, and failure of resin dental composite materials.

Authors:  J L Drummond
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.116

7.  Vinyl sulfonamide based thermosetting composites via thiol-Michael polymerization.

Authors:  Jasmine Sinha; Adam Dobson; Osamah Bankhar; Maciej Podgórski; Parag K Shah; Sheryl L W Zajdowicz; Abdulaziz Alotaibi; Jeffrey W Stansbury; Christopher N Bowman
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 5.304

8.  Evaluation of the Clinical Impact of ISO 4049 in Comparison with Miniflexural Test on Mechanical Performances of Resin Based Composite.

Authors:  Luigi Calabrese; Francesca Fabiano; Lucio Maria Bonaccorsi; Valerio Fabiano; Chiara Borsellino
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2015-02-28

9.  Chemistry of Silanes: Interfaces in Dental Polymers and Composites.

Authors:  Joseph M Antonucci; Sabine H Dickens; Bruce O Fowler; Hockin H K Xu; Walter G McDonough
Journal:  J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol       Date:  2005-10-01

10.  Current practicality of nanotechnology in dentistry. Part 1: Focus on nanocomposite restoratives and biomimetics.

Authors:  Scott A Saunders
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2009-11-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.