Literature DB >> 11773928

Prognostic value of a negative stress echocardiographic study in diabetic patients.

Masoor Kamalesh1, Robert Matorin, Stephen Sawada.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diabetic patients have increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. We compared the long-term prognostic value of a negative, nonischemic stress echocardiogram in patients with and without diabetes.
METHODS: Two hundred thirty-six consecutive subjects who had stress echocardiography and who were negative for inducible ischemia were included in the study. Baseline cardiac risk factors and cardiac events (cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and coronary revascularization) were identified.
RESULTS: Follow-up was obtained in 233 subjects for a mean duration of 25 months. There were 144 nondiabetic and 89 diabetic patients. At baseline, the diabetic group had a significantly higher incidence of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and history of coronary artery disease but had a lower incidence of smoking (P <.05). Diabetic patients had a significantly higher incidence of cardiac events (19% vs 9.7%, P =.03) and worse event-free survival (P =.03). There were more nonfatal myocardial infarctions in the diabetic group (6.7% vs 1.4%, P <.05) and a trend toward a higher proportion of hard events (myocardial infarction and cardiac death) in diabetic patients (12.4% vs 5.6%, P =.11). The hard event rate per year of follow-up was 2.7% in nondiabetic and 6.0% in diabetic patients. In diabetic patients, a history of coronary artery disease was the only predictor of cardiac events (R = 0.18, P <.05).
CONCLUSION: Compared with nondiabetic patients, diabetic patients with negative stress echocardiograms are at greater risk for cardiac events. This appears to be due to a higher prevalence of established coronary disease in diabetic patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11773928     DOI: 10.1067/mhj.2002.119377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  7 in total

1.  Stress Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Effectively Risk Stratifies Diabetic Patients With Suspected Myocardial Ischemia.

Authors:  Bobak Heydari; Yu-Hsiang Juan; Hui Liu; Siddique Abbasi; Ravi Shah; Ron Blankstein; Michael Steigner; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 2.  Cardiovascular imaging in diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Fadi G Hage; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Assessment of dipyridamole stress echocardiography for risk stratification of diabetic patients.

Authors:  Liz Andréa Villela Baroncini; Rafael Borsoi; Maria Eugênia Bégué Vidal; Nathália Julim Valente; Juliana Veloso; Roberto Pecoits Filho
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 2.062

Review 4.  Coronary Atherosclerosis Assessment by Coronary CT Angiography in Asymptomatic Diabetic Population: A Critical Systematic Review of the Literature and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Andrea Igoren Guaricci; Delia De Santis; Mariangela Carbone; Giuseppe Muscogiuri; Marco Guglielmo; Andrea Baggiano; Gaetano Serviddio; Gianluca Pontone
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  The clinical use of stress echocardiography in ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  Rosa Sicari; Lauro Cortigiani
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.062

6.  Prognostic value of exercise echocardiography in diabetic patients.

Authors:  Joselina L M Oliveira; José A S Barreto-Filho; Carla R P Oliveira; Thaiana A Santana; Fernando D Anjos-Andrade; Erica O Alves; Adão C Nascimento-Junior; Thiago J S Góes; Nathalie O Santana; Francis L Vasconcelos; Martha A Barreto; Argemiro D'Oliveira Junior; Roberto Salvatori; Manuel H Aguiar-Oliveira; Antônio C S Sousa
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 2.062

7.  Prognostic value of calcium score and coronary flow velocity reserve in asymptomatic diabetic patients.

Authors:  Miodrag Dikic; Milorad Tesic; Zeljko Markovic; Vojislav Giga; Ana Djordjevic-Dikic; Jelena Stepanovic; Branko Beleslin; Ivana Jovanovic; Ana Mladenovic; Jelena Seferovic; Miodrag Ostojic; Aleksandra Arandjelovic
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.062

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.