Literature DB >> 11773841

Prevention of postoperative meatal stenosis with anteriorly and inferiorly based periosteal flaps in congenital aural atresia surgery.

Sun O Chang1, Sang-Jun Jeon, Han-Sin Jeong, Chong Sun Kim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate postoperative meatal stenosis after surgery for congenital aural atresia using anteriorly and inferiorly based periosteal flaps (AIPFs). These were compared with the groups that did not use these flaps. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a retrospective clinical study.
SETTING: The study was conducted at the tertiary referral hospital. PATIENTS: There were 133 patients (151 ears) who had undergone surgical correction for congenital aural atresia from November 1987 to March 1999. INTERVENTION: The anterior approach surgical method was used to correct the congenital aural atresia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: A comparison between the 2 groups, 1 using the AIPFs and the other that did not use the AIPFs, was performed to evaluate both the incidence and the interval of postoperative meatal stenosis. The correlation between the age of the first operation to correct congenital aural atresia and the incidence of postoperative meatal stenosis was also investigated.
RESULTS: Meatal stenosis was the most common postoperative complication (23.8%) found. The incidence of meatal stenosis was much lower in the group using AIPFs (n = 105) than in the group that did not (n = 46) (19.0% versus 35.0%). The interval for the development of postoperative meatal stenosis showed similar distribution in both groups. In age distribution, the younger the age of the first operation, the more frequent the occurrence of postoperative meatal stenosis.
CONCLUSION: AIPF is an effective surgical method for reducing the incidence of postoperative meatal stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11773841     DOI: 10.1097/00129492-200201000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  7 in total

1.  Reconstructive methods in hearing disorders - surgical methods.

Authors:  Thomas Zahnert
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-09-28

2.  Prognostic factors for long-term hearing preservation after canal-tympanoplasty for congenital aural atresia.

Authors:  Takashi Sakamoto; Shu Kikuta; Yayoi S Kikkawa; Makoto Kinoshita; Yuki Saito; Kenya Kobayashi; Akinobu Kakigi; Mitsuya Suzuki; Tatsuya Yamasoba
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Congenital aural atresia surgery: transmastoid approach, complications and outcomes.

Authors:  Faramarz Memari; Marjan Mirsalehi; Ali Jalali
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  A New Flap Technique for Reconstruction of Microtia and Congenital Aural Atresia.

Authors:  Kun Chen; Chenyan Jiang; Qingwei Wu; Yiyuan Sun; Runjie Shi
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 5.  Congenital auditory meatal atresia: a numerical review.

Authors:  Mohammad Abdel-Azim El-Begermy; Ossama Ibrahim Mansour; Aly Mohammad Nagy El-Makhzangy; Tamer Saleh El-Gindy
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Safety and efficacy of transcutaneous bone conduction implant surgery for hearing improvement in microtia patients with bilateral hearing impairment.

Authors:  Jeong Hyun Cheon; Hyung Chul Lee; Gi Jung Im; Jung Youl Park; Chul Park
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2019-11-15

7.  Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid vs. Reconstruction of the External Auditory Canal in Children and Adolescents with Congenital Aural Atresia: A Comparison Study of Outcomes.

Authors:  Soroush Farnoosh; F Tania Mitsinikos; Dennis Maceri; Debra M Don
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.418

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.