Literature DB >> 1177336

Current concepts in the management of penetrating neck trauma.

C H Sheely, K L Mattox, G J Reul, A C Beall, M E DeBakey.   

Abstract

Six hundred thirty-two cases of penetrating wounds of the neck were analyzed in this study in order to re-evaluate our current concepts in the management of these injuries. There were 35 deaths in this series, an overall mortality rate of 5.5%. However, in the last 10 years there were only 13 deaths among 407 patients, a 3.2% mortality rate. Early exploration was performed in 507 patients, and 125 patients were observed. Explorations revealed a total of 625 separate injuries. In 142 explorations, no injury was found. There was no mortality or significant morbidity in these patients with negative explorations. Patients who presented with obvious vascular or visceral injury were immediately explored. Those wounds without obvious injury were either explored or observed, depending on the index of clinical suspicion based on awareness of the innocuous presentation and difficulty in diagnosing esophageal injuries. The mortality rate is a function of multiple factors. Its decrease over the past 25 years is related to many improvements in our health care system. Our own decrease in mortality rate can be attributed in part to decreased transportation time resulting in less blood loss. A greater awareness of esophageal injuries was another factor. No conclusions are possible as to the feasibility of conservative management based upon the mortality rates alone; however, on examination of our experiences with penetrating wounds of the neck, it appears that a significant number of patients when carefully selected by trained personnel can be safely managed with observation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1177336     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-197510000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  8 in total

1.  Panendoscopy with arteriography versus mandatory exploration of penetrating wounds of the neck.

Authors:  L D Noyes; N E McSwain; I P Markowitz
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Penetrating injuries of the neck.

Authors:  D Demetriades; M Stewart
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Penetrating neck wounds. Mandatory versus selective exploration.

Authors:  A M Ayuyao; Y L Kaledzi; M H Parsa; H P Freeman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  The Selective Non-operative Management of Penetrating Cervical Venous Trauma is Safe and Effective.

Authors:  Andre S Madsen; John L Bruce; George V Oosthuizen; Wanda Bekker; Grant L Laing; Damian L Clarke
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Management of penetrating wounds of the neck.

Authors:  M Luntz; S Nusem; J Kronenberg
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  Management of war-related neck injuries during the war in Croatia, 1991-1992.

Authors:  D Prgomet; D Danić; D Milićić; D Leović
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Correlation between the level of the external wound and the internal injury in penetrating neck injury does not favour an initial zonal management approach.

Authors:  A S Madsen; J L Bruce; G V Oosthuizen; W Bekker; M Smith; V Manchev; G L Laing; D L Clarke
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2020-06-11

8.  [Prognostic factors of penetrating neck trauma].

Authors:  José Cruvinel Neto; Rogério Aparecido Dedivitis
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.